BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25455170)

  • 21. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass.
    Guillotreau J; Haber GP; Autorino R; Miocinovic R; Hillyer S; Hernandez A; Laydner H; Yakoubi R; Isac W; Long JA; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
    Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):899-904. PubMed ID: 22264680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site and multiport laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: a prospective, nonrandomized study.
    Bazzi WM; Stroup SP; Kopp RP; Cohen SA; Sakamoto K; Derweesh IH
    Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22990064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Editorial comment on: Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Rassweiler J
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1205. PubMed ID: 18715703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Desai MM; Strzempkowski B; Matin SF; Steinberg AP; Ng C; Meraney AM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 15592021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 100 cases.
    Okegawa T; Noda H; Horie S; Nutahara K; Higashihara E
    Int J Urol; 2008 Oct; 15(11):957-60. PubMed ID: 18775034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 63 cases.
    Berdjis N; Hakenberg OW; Leike S; Zastrow S; Manseck A; Oehlschläger S; Wirth MP
    Urol Int; 2006; 77(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 16888424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics.
    Weizer AZ; Gilbert SM; Roberts WW; Hollenbeck BK; Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1273-8. PubMed ID: 18707711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of oncological outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for the management of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study.
    Ha US; Hwang TK; Kim YJ; Oh TH; Jeon YS; Lee W; Lim JS; Lee TY; Choi Y; Park SK; Byun SS
    BJU Int; 2011 May; 107(9):1467-72. PubMed ID: 20825400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clampless laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy for renal cancer with low PADUA score: technique and surgical outcomes.
    Springer C; Veneziano D; Wimpissinger F; Inferrera A; Fornara P; Greco F
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(7):1091-8. PubMed ID: 23360654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a minimally invasive means to nephron preservation.
    Blitstein J; Ghavamian R
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Jun; 8(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18533801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for bilateral synchronous kidney tumors: single-institution comparative analysis.
    Hillyer SP; Autorino R; Laydner H; Yang B; Altunrende F; White M; Spana G; Khanna R; Isac W; Hernandez AV; Simmons M; Stein R; Haber GP; Kaouk J
    Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 21855967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cancer].
    Xue Z; He XZ; Cui L; Xu RF; Xu XL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 33(8):632-4. PubMed ID: 22325228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery.
    Berger A; Crouzet S; Canes D; Haber GP; Gill IS
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Sep; 18(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 18670268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Simultaneous laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy for native kidney and open nonischemic partial nephrectomy to treat concomitant renal cell carcinomas in native and transplant kidneys and to preserve allograft function.
    Sankari BR; Chueh SC
    Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 22055688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
    McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 1996 Feb; 10(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8833728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cancer--a report of 43 cases].
    Luo JH; Chen W; Chen LW; Sun XZ; Chen JX; Li XF; Mei H
    Ai Zheng; 2007 Jun; 26(6):629-32. PubMed ID: 17562270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Simultaneous robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy: first experience on 3 patients with short-term follow-up].
    Peter J; May M; Ahmed AM; Ahmed A; Gilfrich C
    Aktuelle Urol; 2012 Jul; 43(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 22869496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.
    Nambirajan T; Jeschke S; Al-Zahrani H; Vrabec G; Leeb K; Janetschek G
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):919-24. PubMed ID: 15533478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Editorial comment on: Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Naspro R
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1205-6. PubMed ID: 18715699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.