These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25455319)

  • 21. The inter-arm blood pressure difference and peripheral vascular disease: cross-sectional study.
    Clark CE; Campbell JL; Powell RJ; Thompson JF
    Fam Pract; 2007 Oct; 24(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 17670807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ankle blood pressure measured by automatic oscillotonometry: a comparison with Doppler pressure measurements.
    Adiseshiah M; Cross FW; Belsham PA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Nov; 69(6):271-3. PubMed ID: 3426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three methods of taking the brachial systolic pressure to measure the ankle/brachial index: which one is best?
    O'Flynn I
    J Vasc Nurs; 1993 Sep; 11(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 8286273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Advances in noninvasive measurement of ankle-brachial index].
    Liu B; Liu K; Zhu H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 26(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 19813640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Level of Agreement Between Forearm and Upper Arm Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients With Large Arm Circumference.
    Watson S; Aguas M; Colegrove P; Foisy N; Jondahl B; Anastas Z
    J Perianesth Nurs; 2017 Feb; 32(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28212904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association between an elevated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference, the ankle-brachial index, and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Ena J; Pérez-Martín S; Argente CR; Lozano T
    Clin Investig Arterioscler; 2020; 32(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 32044138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the systolic blood pressure of the upper and lower limbs in young adults.
    Mwoyofiri T; Chinyanga HM
    Cent Afr J Med; 2011; 57(1-4):5-8. PubMed ID: 24968655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements in NICU Infants.
    Dasnadi S; Aliaga S; Laughon M; Warner DD; Price WA
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Jun; 32(7):639-44. PubMed ID: 25344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of non-invasive blood pressure measurements on the arm and calf during cesarean delivery.
    Zahn J; Bernstein H; Hossain S; Bodian C; Beilin Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2000; 16(8):557-62. PubMed ID: 12580231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inter-rater reliability of automated devices for measurement of toe systolic blood pressure and the toe brachial index.
    Sonter J; Sadler S; Chuter V
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 25171258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blood Pressure measurements are site dependent in a cohort of patients with neurological illness.
    Siaron KB; Cortes MX; Stutzman SE; Venkatachalam A; Ahmed KM; Olson DM
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3382. PubMed ID: 32099051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aging attenuates the interarm diastolic blood pressure difference induced by one-arm exercise.
    Hu WT; Li JX; Wang JW; Xu JS; Yang Q; Geng YJ; Su H; Cheng XS
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Apr; 18(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 23425691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of ankle-brachial index obtained by automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Ena J; Lozano T; Verdú G; Argente CR; González VL
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2011 Jun; 92(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 21397352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of a method for determination of the ankle-brachial index in the seated position.
    Gornik HL; Garcia B; Wolski K; Jones DC; Macdonald KA; Fronek A
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 48(5):1204-10. PubMed ID: 18829231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of calibration on estimates of central blood pressures.
    Soender TK; Van Bortel LM; Møller JE; Lambrechtsen J; Hangaard J; Egstrup K
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Dec; 26(12):706-10. PubMed ID: 22048713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements in critically ill premature infants.
    Takci S; Yigit S; Korkmaz A; Yurdakök M
    Acta Paediatr; 2012 Feb; 101(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 21880068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of aortic and brachial cuff pressures in flat supine and lateral recumbent positions.
    Newton KM
    Heart Lung; 1981; 10(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 6912233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feasibility and reproducibility of noninvasive 24-h ambulatory aortic blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff-based oscillometric device.
    Protogerou AD; Argyris A; Nasothimiou E; Vrachatis D; Papaioannou TG; Tzamouranis D; Blacher J; Safar ME; Sfikakis P; Stergiou GS
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Aug; 25(8):876-82. PubMed ID: 22673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.