273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25455775)
1. Theoretical investigations into the influence of the position of a breaking line on the tensile failure of flat, round, bevel-edged tablets using finite element methodology (FEM) and its practical relevance for industrial tablet strength testing.
Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
Int J Pharm; 2014 Dec; 477(1-2):306-16. PubMed ID: 25455775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The bending strength of tablets with a breaking line--Comparison of the results of an elastic and a "brittle cracking" finite element model with experimental findings.
Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
Int J Pharm; 2015 Nov; 495(1):485-499. PubMed ID: 26363109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigations into the tensile failure of doubly-convex cylindrical tablets under diametral loading using finite element methodology.
Podczeck F; Drake KR; Newton JM
Int J Pharm; 2013 Sep; 454(1):412-24. PubMed ID: 23834836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reevaluation of the diametral compression test for tablets using the flattened disc geometry.
Mazel V; Guerard S; Croquelois B; Kopp JB; Girardot J; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):669-677. PubMed ID: 27702696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strength Simulation of Scored Tablets Based on the Finite Element Method Using an Extreme Vertices Design.
Hayashi Y; Okada N; Takayama K; Obata Y; Onuki Y
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2018; 66(7):727-731. PubMed ID: 29962456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical Stress Simulation of Scored Tablets Based on the Finite Element Method and Experimental Verification.
Okada N; Hayashi Y; Onuki Y; Miura T; Obata Y; Takayama K
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2016; 64(8):1142-8. PubMed ID: 27477653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tensile stresses generated in pharmaceutical tablets by opposing compressive line loads.
Drake KR; Newton JM; Mokhtary-Saghafi S; Davies PN
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2007 Mar; 30(3-4):273-9. PubMed ID: 17194580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of breaking tests for the characterization of the interfacial strength of bilayer tablets.
Castrati L; Mazel V; Busignies V; Diarra H; Rossi A; Colombo P; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27717917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of tablet characteristics from residual stress distribution estimated by the finite element method.
Hayashi Y; Miura T; Shimada T; Onuki Y; Obata Y; Takayama K
J Pharm Sci; 2013 Oct; 102(10):3678-86. PubMed ID: 23897300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the effect of tablet thickness and punch curvature on density distribution using finite elements method.
Diarra H; Mazel V; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2015 Sep; 493(1-2):121-8. PubMed ID: 26200746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of the validity of the three-point bending test for pharmaceutical round tablets using finite element method modeling.
Mazel V; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
J Pharm Sci; 2014 Apr; 103(4):1305-8. PubMed ID: 24523243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methods for the practical determination of the mechanical strength of tablets--from empiricism to science.
Podczeck F
Int J Pharm; 2012 Oct; 436(1-2):214-32. PubMed ID: 22776803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Axial strength test for round flat faced versus capsule shaped bilayer tablets.
Franck J; Abebe A; Keluskar R; Martin K; Majumdar A; Kottala N; Stamato H
Pharm Dev Technol; 2015 Mar; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 24219774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Numerical Investigation of the Residual Stress Distribution of Flat-Faced and Convexly Curved Tablets Using the Finite Element Method.
Otoguro S; Hayashi Y; Miura T; Uehara N; Utsumi S; Onuki Y; Obata Y; Takayama K
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2015; 63(11):890-900. PubMed ID: 26279237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of the Die-Wall Pressure during the Compression of Biconvex Tablets: Experimental Results and Comparison with FEM Simulation.
Mazel V; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
J Pharm Sci; 2015 Dec; 104(12):4339-4344. PubMed ID: 26460539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The determination of the mechanical strength of tablets of different shapes.
Davies PN; Worthington HE; Podczeck F; Newton JM
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2007 Aug; 67(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 17329086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive model for tensile strength of pharmaceutical tablets based on local hardness measurements.
Juban A; Nouguier-Lehon C; Briancon S; Hoc T; Puel F
Int J Pharm; 2015 Jul; 490(1-2):438-45. PubMed ID: 26043825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. General and mechanistic optimal relationships for tensile strength of doubly convex tablets under diametrical compression.
Razavi SM; Gonzalez M; Cuitiño AM
Int J Pharm; 2015 Apr; 484(1-2):29-37. PubMed ID: 25683146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of process variables on the Drucker-Prager cap model and residual stress distribution of tablets estimated by the finite element method.
Hayashi Y; Otoguro S; Miura T; Onuki Y; Obata Y; Takayama K
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2014; 62(11):1062-72. PubMed ID: 25109913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breaking patterns of press-coated tablets during the diametral compression test: Influence of the product, geometry and process parameters.
Picart L; Mazel V; Moulin A; Bourgeaux V; Tchoreloff P
Int J Pharm; 2022 Jan; 612():121371. PubMed ID: 34902454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
