209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25456089)
1. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.
Hochmair I; Hochmair E; Nopp P; Waller M; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():14-23. PubMed ID: 25456089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.
Jeschke M; Moser T
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():224-34. PubMed ID: 25601298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
Clark GM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
Chouard CH
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.
Merzenich MM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Landsberger DM; Mertens G; Punte AK; Van De Heyning P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):EL75-81. PubMed ID: 25234918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility.
Croghan NBH; Duran SI; Smith ZM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL537. PubMed ID: 29289062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binaural hearing with electrical stimulation.
Kan A; Litovsky RY
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():127-37. PubMed ID: 25193553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
