136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25456144)
1. Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration.
Hopp T; Duric N; Ruiter NV
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Mar; 40():170-81. PubMed ID: 25456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fusion of vibro-acoustography images and X-ray mammography.
GholamHosseini H; Alizad A; Fatemi M
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2803-6. PubMed ID: 17946531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-Ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound.
Sinha SP; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Nees AV; Goodsitt MM; LeCarpentier GL; Fowlkes JB; Chalek CL; Carson PL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():1335-8. PubMed ID: 18002210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterizing breast lesions through robust multimodal data fusion using independent diffuse optical and x-ray breast imaging.
Deng B; Fradkin M; Rouet JM; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Boas DA; Lundqvist M; Fang Q
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Aug; 20(8):80502. PubMed ID: 26263413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of mammographic breast compression in 3D MR images using ICP-based B-spline deformation for multimodality breast cancer diagnosis.
Krüger J; Ehrhardt J; Bischof A; Handels H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 May; 9(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 24430800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mono- and multimodal registration of optical breast images.
Pearlman PC; Adams A; Elias SG; Mali WP; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Aug; 17(8):080901-1. PubMed ID: 23224161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms.
Hopp T; Baltzer P; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Ruiter NV
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 May; 7(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 21643945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.
Gu P; Lee WM; Roubidoux MA; Yuan J; Wang X; Carson PL
Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():51-8. PubMed ID: 26547117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing motion artifacts in 3-D breast ultrasound using non-linear registration.
Boehler T; Peitgen HO
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):998-1005. PubMed ID: 18982702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 2D/3D registration of TEE probe from two non-orthogonal C-arm directions.
Kaiser M; John M; Heimann T; Brost A; Neumuth T; Rose G
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 1):283-90. PubMed ID: 25333129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 2D/3D registration for X-ray guided bronchoscopy using distance map classification.
Xu D; Xu S; Herzka DA; Yung RC; Bergtholdt M; Gutierrez LF; McVeigh ER
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3715-8. PubMed ID: 21097052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions.
Markelj P; Tomaževič D; Likar B; Pernuš F
Med Image Anal; 2012 Apr; 16(3):642-61. PubMed ID: 20452269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deformable mapping using biomechanical models to relate corresponding lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Roubidoux MA; Brock KK; Davis CL; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Image Anal; 2020 Feb; 60():101599. PubMed ID: 31760192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values.
García E; Diez Y; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Martí R; Martí J; Oliver A
Med Image Anal; 2019 May; 54():76-87. PubMed ID: 30836308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
