BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457072)

  • 1. Evaluation of hearing protection used by police officers in the shooting range.
    Guida HL; Taxini CL; Gonçalves CG; Valenti VE
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2014; 80(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 25457072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic and psychoacoustic analysis of the noise produced by the police force firearms.
    Guida HL; Diniz TH; Kinoshita SK
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 21537617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors for Use in An Indoor Shooting Range.
    Mlynski R; Kozlowski E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 31252535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.
    Murphy WJ; Flamme GA; Campbell AR; Zechmann EL; Tasko SM; Lankford JE; Meinke DK; Finan DS; Stewart M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S28-S41. PubMed ID: 29299940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of noise exposure for indoor and outdoor firing ranges.
    Murphy WJ; Tubbs RL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):688-97. PubMed ID: 17654224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) prevention.
    Sułkowski W; Owczarek K; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2017 Aug; 71(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 29116045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise reduction at the shooting range by means of level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Med Pr; 2019 Jun; 70(3):265-273. PubMed ID: 30887954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ten-year longitudinal study of the effect of impulse noise exposure from gunshot on inner ear function.
    Wu CC; Young YH
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(9):655-60. PubMed ID: 19925337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation of peak sound pressure levels of shooting noise by hearing protective earmuffs.
    Lenzuni P; Sangiorgi T; Cerini L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(58):91-9. PubMed ID: 22718106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise attenuation of communication hearing protectors against impulses from assault rifle.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S
    Mil Med; 1998 Jan; 163(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9465571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise Exposure on a Warship during Firing of a Heavy Machine Gun.
    Paddan GS
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Nov; 59(9):1208-11. PubMed ID: 26240198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.
    Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Murphy WJ; Stergar ME
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):13-21. PubMed ID: 27885881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing loss risk from exposure to shooting impulses in workers exposed to occupational noise.
    Pekkarinen J; Iki M; Starck J; Pyykkö I
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Jun; 27(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8241966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevention of acute acoustic trauma by earmuffs during military training.
    Dhammadejsakdi N; Boonyanukul S; Jaruchinda S; Aramrattana A; Eiumtrakul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S1-6. PubMed ID: 21302411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prolonged exposure to gunfire noise among professional soldiers.
    Ylikoski ME
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1994 Apr; 20(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 8079139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective evaluation of a prototype earmuff exhibiting flat and nonlinear attenuation characteristics.
    Stokes JP; Royster LH; Pearson RG; Royster JD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Feb; 52(2):52-60. PubMed ID: 2011979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of impact noise on the hearing of military personnel.
    Heupa AB; Gonçalves CG; Coifman H
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(6):747-53. PubMed ID: 22183281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.