140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457072)
21. Comparison of muzzle suppression and ear-level hearing protection in firearm use.
Branch MP
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 144(6):950-3. PubMed ID: 21493334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Temporary hearing threshold shift in policemen after firearm training].
Cassano F; Montesano R; Bobbio E; Borraccia V; Volpe C; Bavaro P; Quaranta N
Med Lav; 2012; 103(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 22619989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Analysis of hearing threshold shift measured by otoacoustic emissions in soldiers after shooting with use hearing protectors].
Olszewski J; Miłońiski J; Olszewski S
Med Pr; 2006; 57(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 16871954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
Tikka C; Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Ferrite S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD006396. PubMed ID: 28685503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hearing protection against high-level shooting impulses in relation to hearing damage risk criteria.
Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Ylikoski JS
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 1737871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In-ear and on-body measurements of impulse-noise exposure.
Davis SK; Calamia PT; Murphy WJ; Smalt CJ
Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(sup1):S49-S57. PubMed ID: 30614318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.
Murphy WJ; Flamme GA; Meinke DK; Sondergaard J; Finan DS; Lankford JE; Khan A; Vernon J; Stewart M
Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. PubMed ID: 22176308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Determining attenuation of impulse noise with an electrical equivalent of a hearing protection device.
Młyński R; Kozłowski E
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 23498707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noise-induced hearing loss caused by gunshot in South Korean military service.
Moon IS
Mil Med; 2007 Apr; 172(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 17484317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hearing protection plans require proper ear plug selection, usage. Train workers on noise hazards and motivate them to wear hearing protectors.
Phoon WH; Lee HS
Occup Health Saf; 1993 May; 62(5):98-100, 117. PubMed ID: 8515941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting.
Meinke DK; Murphy WJ; Finan DS; Lankford JE; Flamme GA; Stewart M; Soendergaard J; Jerome TW
Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2(0 2):S16-25. PubMed ID: 24564688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Method for protected noise exposure level assessment under an in-ear hearing protection device: a pilot study.
Nadon V; Bonnet F; Bouserhal RE; Bernier A; Voix J
Int J Audiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 32749172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
