These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457072)

  • 41. Method for protected noise exposure level assessment under an in-ear hearing protection device: a pilot study.
    Nadon V; Bonnet F; Bouserhal RE; Bernier A; Voix J
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 32749172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):11-20. PubMed ID: 16053601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Bockstael A; Keppler H; Dhooge I; D'haenens W; Maes L; Philips B; Vinck B
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Mar; 47(3):119-33. PubMed ID: 18307092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Barriers to hearing conservation programs in combat arms occupations.
    Abel SM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2008 Jun; 79(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 18581943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Occupational exposure to impulse noise associated with shooting.
    Lwow F; Jóźków P; Mędraś M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2011; 17(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 21375955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Shooting habits of youth recreational firearm users.
    Stewart M; Meinke DK; Snyders JK; Howerton K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2():S26-34. PubMed ID: 24564690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
    Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
    Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The insertion loss distribution function of an ear plug, and its implications for the ear plug acceptability.
    Lenzuni P; Annesi D; Nataletti P
    Noise Health; 2020; 22(105):35-45. PubMed ID: 33380615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Physical characteristics of gunfire impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Ylikoski M; Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Pääkkönen RJ; Ylikoski JS
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7761796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Out of sound is out of sight: hearing protection falls short.
    Read HP
    Occup Health Saf; 1988 Feb; 57(2):17, 57-8. PubMed ID: 3357672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Noise dosimetry for tactical environments.
    Smalt CJ; Lacirignola J; Davis SK; Calamia PT; Collins PP
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():42-54. PubMed ID: 27876480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The efficiency of earmuffs against impulse noise from firearms.
    Ylikoski J; Pekkarinen J; Starck J
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 3629173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Differential effects of suppressors on hazardous sound pressure levels generated by AR-15 rifles: Considerations for recreational shooters, law enforcement, and the military.
    Lobarinas E; Scott R; Spankovich C; Le Prell CG
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S59-71. PubMed ID: 26821935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Hearing protection in acute acoustic trauma in Finnish conscripts.
    Savolainen S; Lehtomäki KM
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8658027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory risk of air rifles.
    Lankford JE; Meinke DK; Flamme GA; Finan DS; Stewart M; Tasko S; Murphy WJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-8. PubMed ID: 26840923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Mathew JL; Martins RH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Apr; (4):CD005234. PubMed ID: 22513929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Noise exposure and noise induced hearing loss among Kuala Lumpur traffic point duty personnel.
    Thomas N; Mariah AN; Fuad A; Kuljit S; Philip R
    Med J Malaysia; 2007 Jun; 62(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 18705450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.
    El Dib RP; Mathew JL; Martins RH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD005234. PubMed ID: 21901696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effectiveness of earmuffs in protecting hearing during shooting practice: a case-study.
    Rawool VW; Campbell C
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):545-552. PubMed ID: 29490517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Assessment and analysis of the acoustic environment of soldiers exposed to impulse noise].
    Konopka W; Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Zalewski P; Miłoński J
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 12577807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.