These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457243)

  • 1. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with sonographically visible clip: optimizing tailored resection and clear margins.
    Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Sartani A; Bossi D; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Truffi M; Bonzini M; Foschi D
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jun; 209(6):950-8. PubMed ID: 25457243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions in an academic comprehensive cancer program community hospital setting.
    Chiu JC; Ajmal S; Zhu X; Griffith E; Encarnacion T; Barr L
    Am Surg; 2014 Jul; 80(7):675-9. PubMed ID: 24987899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.
    Kim SH; Cornacchi SD; Heller B; Farrokhyar F; Babra M; Lovrics PJ
    Am J Surg; 2013 Jun; 205(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 23465329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
    Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
    J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.
    Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
    Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
    Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.
    Corsi F; Bossi D; Combi F; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Regolo L; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Mazzucchelli S; Sorrentino L
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 119(7):916-924. PubMed ID: 30742309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT).
    Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin.
    Slijkhuis WA; Noorda EM; van der Zaag-Loonen H; Eenennaam MJ; Greve KE; Lastdrager WB; Gratama JW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 27444926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
    Smitt MC; Horst K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
    Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
    Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
    Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
    Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
    van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.
    Fancellu A; Soro D; Castiglia P; Marras V; Melis M; Cottu P; Cherchi A; Spanu A; Mulas S; Pusceddu C; Simbula L; Meloni GB
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 24321101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
    Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.