200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457243)
1. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions with sonographically visible clip: optimizing tailored resection and clear margins.
Corsi F; Sorrentino L; Sartani A; Bossi D; Amadori R; Nebuloni M; Truffi M; Bonzini M; Foschi D
Am J Surg; 2015 Jun; 209(6):950-8. PubMed ID: 25457243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions in an academic comprehensive cancer program community hospital setting.
Chiu JC; Ajmal S; Zhu X; Griffith E; Encarnacion T; Barr L
Am Surg; 2014 Jul; 80(7):675-9. PubMed ID: 24987899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Kim SH; Cornacchi SD; Heller B; Farrokhyar F; Babra M; Lovrics PJ
Am J Surg; 2013 Jun; 205(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 23465329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The importance of pre-operative needle core breast biopsy results on resected tissue volume, margin status, and cosmesis.
Polat AV; Soran A; Andacoglu O; Kamali Polat A; McGuire K; Diego E; Johnson R
J BUON; 2013; 18(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 24065470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.
Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.
Corsi F; Bossi D; Combi F; Papadopoulou O; Amadori R; Regolo L; Trifirò G; Albasini S; Mazzucchelli S; Sorrentino L
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 119(7):916-924. PubMed ID: 30742309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT).
Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin.
Slijkhuis WA; Noorda EM; van der Zaag-Loonen H; Eenennaam MJ; Greve KE; Lastdrager WB; Gratama JW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 27444926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium.
van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of magnetic resonance in patients with invasive cancer eligible for breast conservation: a comparative study.
Fancellu A; Soro D; Castiglia P; Marras V; Melis M; Cottu P; Cherchi A; Spanu A; Mulas S; Pusceddu C; Simbula L; Meloni GB
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Apr; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 24321101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
