These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457394)

  • 1. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Sagittal photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profile between two different racial groups: a comparative study].
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Jun; 38(150):5-14. PubMed ID: 26934767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.
    Milosević SA; Varga ML; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18216697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic analysis of the cervicofacial region.
    Zweig BE
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 8(2):1-11. PubMed ID: 11212552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents.
    Hamdan AM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 19852644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jul; 122(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12142898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of cephalometric soft tissue profile among adolescents from the three West African countries of Nigeria, Ghana and Senegal.
    Fadeju AD; Otuyemi OD; Ngom PI; Newman-Nartey M
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 23524548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial photogrammetric profile measurements and sagittal dental occlusion in the young Congolese Bantu Adult (DRC).
    Esabish PL; Beugre-Kouassi LMA; Baukaka FS; Nzanza RM; Gboro TD; Beugre JB
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):342-353. PubMed ID: 31053446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.