These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457570)
1. Feasibility of ultra-low radiation dose reduction for renal stone CT using model-based iterative reconstruction: prospective pilot study. Scott Kriegshauser J; Naidu SG; Paden RG; He M; Wu Q; Hara AK Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 25457570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance. Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen. Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality comparison between model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction chest computed tomography in cystic fibrosis patients. Lin S; Lin M; Lau KK J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 63(5):602-609. PubMed ID: 31090256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients. Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum. Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality. Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic. Fontarensky M; Alfidja A; Perignon R; Schoenig A; Perrier C; Mulliez A; Guy L; Boyer L Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 25848899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients. Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction does not alter anatomical image quality. Macri F; Greffier J; Pereira FR; Mandoul C; Khasanova E; Gualdi G; Beregi JP Diagn Interv Imaging; 2016 Nov; 97(11):1131-1140. PubMed ID: 27451261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Detecting Hepatic Metastases on Submillisievert Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Son JH; Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Lim YJ; Kim SJ J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28099224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]