606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25457654)
1. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The multi-channel cochlear implant: multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit.
Clark GM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():4-13. PubMed ID: 25159273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.
Hochmair I; Hochmair E; Nopp P; Waller M; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():14-23. PubMed ID: 25456089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The early days of the multi channel cochlear implant: efforts and achievement in France.
Chouard CH
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():47-51. PubMed ID: 25499127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results with a cochlear implant channel-picking strategy based on "Selected Groups".
Kals M; Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Vermeire K; Visser D; Bader P; Neustetter C; Zangerl M; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 19944138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory implant research at the House Ear Institute 1989-2013.
Shannon RV
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():57-66. PubMed ID: 25449009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.
Svirsky MA; Talavage TM; Sinha S; Neuburger H; Azadpour M
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():163-70. PubMed ID: 25445816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants.
Merzenich MM
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of responses to cochlear implant stimulation at different levels of the auditory pathway.
Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():67-76. PubMed ID: 25445817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
Nogueira W; Rode T; Büchner A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Getting a decent (but sparse) signal to the brain for users of cochlear implants.
Wilson BS
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():24-38. PubMed ID: 25500178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compensation for channel interaction in a simultaneous cochlear implant coding strategy.
Bader P; Kals M; Schatzer R; Griessner A; Zierhofer C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4124-32. PubMed ID: 23742364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of the Nurotron 26-electrode cochlear implant system.
Zeng FG; Rebscher SJ; Fu QJ; Chen H; Sun X; Yin L; Ping L; Feng H; Yang S; Gong S; Yang B; Kang HY; Gao N; Chi F
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():188-99. PubMed ID: 25281795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A neural-based vocoder implementation for evaluating cochlear implant coding strategies.
El Boghdady N; Kegel A; Lai WK; Dillier N
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():136-149. PubMed ID: 26775182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants.
Jeschke M; Moser T
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():224-34. PubMed ID: 25601298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
