These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25458226)

  • 1. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.
    Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis.
    Hwang JY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY; Nam MY
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 26256979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An audit of the results of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of mammography versus ultrasound screen-detected breast lesions.
    Rhee SJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):261-266. PubMed ID: 28182285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
    Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.
    Barr RG; Zhang Z; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Berg WA
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):701-12. PubMed ID: 23962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
    Weigert J; Steenbergen S
    Breast J; 2015; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25683369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
    Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
    Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
    Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
    Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
    BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.
    Yoon H; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park BW; Kim MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):2099-107. PubMed ID: 25952162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.