These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25459278)

  • 1. Drawbacks in the scientification of forensic science.
    Biedermann A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():e38-40. PubMed ID: 25459278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the value of probability for evaluating results of comparative pattern analyses.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):e44-5. PubMed ID: 24029074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the limitations of probability in conceptualizing pattern matches in forensic science: Response to "On the value of probability for evaluating results of comparative pattern analysis" by Alex Biedermann and Franco Taroni [Forensic Sci. Int. 232 (2013) e44-e45].
    Jayaprakash PT
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jun; 239():e10-1. PubMed ID: 24767475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science.
    Jayaprakash PT
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):403.e1-16. PubMed ID: 23849815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge.
    Evett I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The subjectivist interpretation of probability and the problem of individualisation in forensic science.
    Biedermann A; Garbolino P; Taroni F
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23601728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence.
    Roux C; Talbot-Wright B; Robertson J; Crispino F; Ribaux O
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter to FSI re: "Can forensic science learn from the COVID-19 crisis?" Forensic Science International, V316, 2020.
    Houck MM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110575. PubMed ID: 33221061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Questions about forensic science.
    Langenburg G
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):607-10; author reply 607-10. PubMed ID: 16459363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter to the editor--Professionalism: ethics and scholarship in forensic science.
    Passalacqua NV; Pilloud MA; Gruters GA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Mar; 59(2):573-5. PubMed ID: 24602059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al.
    Biedermann A; Hicks T; Taroni F; Champod C; Aitken C
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):316-8. PubMed ID: 25002051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. initiatives to strengthen forensic science & international standards in forensic DNA.
    Butler JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Sep; 18():4-20. PubMed ID: 26164236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crème de la crème in forensic science and legal medicine. The most highly cited articles, authors and journals 1981-2003.
    Jones AW
    Int J Legal Med; 2005 Mar; 119(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 15645298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: Should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications?
    Taroni F; Biedermann A; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Feb; 259():e32-6. PubMed ID: 26743713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The current status of forensic science laboratory accreditation in Europe.
    Malkoc E; Neuteboom W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16876355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T.
    Berger CE; Buckleton J; Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Jun; 51(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 21605824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic identification: From a faith-based "Science" to a scientific science.
    Saks MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):14-7. PubMed ID: 20395085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anti-doping researchers should conform to certain statistical standards from forensic science.
    Faber K; Sjerps M
    Sci Justice; 2009 Sep; 49(3):214-5. PubMed ID: 19839422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.