86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25459594)
1. How close is close enough?
Gewirtz H
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(11):1128-9. PubMed ID: 25459594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting outcomes in heart transplantation: PET project or actionable data.
Givertz MM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):857-9. PubMed ID: 25406196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Attenuation correction for stress and rest PET 82Rb myocardial perfusion images.
Eisner RL; Patterson RE
J Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 48(11):1912-3; author reply 1913-4. PubMed ID: 17978359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Case Report: Multivessel Coronary Disease Assessment with SPECT 99mTc-Sestamibi and Rubidium-82 PET/CT.
Padilha BG; Sabino D; Giorgi MC; Soares J; Izaki M; Meneghetti JC
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 108(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 28146214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-dose 3D (82)Rb PET.
Slomka PJ; Berman DS; Germano G
J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1110-2. PubMed ID: 23129187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Artery Calcium Score by Hybrid 82Rb PET/CT Improves Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.
Brodov Y; Gransar H; Dey D; Shalev A; Germano G; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Rogatko A; Berman DS; Slomka PJ
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1345-50. PubMed ID: 26159582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients after heart transplant.
Mc Ardle BA; Davies RA; Chen L; Small GR; Ruddy TD; Dwivedi G; Yam Y; Haddad H; Mielniczuk LM; Stadnick E; Hessian R; Guo A; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA; Chow BJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):930-7. PubMed ID: 25182366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal Adenosine Stress for Maximum Stress Perfusion, Coronary Flow Reserve, and Pixel Distribution of Coronary Flow Capacity by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Analysis.
Kitkungvan D; Lai D; Zhu H; Roby AE; Johnson NP; Steptoe DD; Patel MB; Kirkeeide R; Gould KL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28213449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of short-term cardiovascular events using quantification of global myocardial flow reserve in patients referred for clinical 82Rb PET perfusion imaging.
Fukushima K; Javadi MS; Higuchi T; Lautamäki R; Merrill J; Nekolla SG; Bengel FM
J Nucl Med; 2011 May; 52(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 21498538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidental mammary fibromyoblastoma on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging.
Pelletier-Galarneau M; Martineau P; Davies RA
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 40(4):343-4. PubMed ID: 25546224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.
Lortie M; Beanlands RS; Yoshinaga K; Klein R; Dasilva JN; DeKemp RA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Nov; 34(11):1765-74. PubMed ID: 17619189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will the new advantages provided by PET in myocardial perfusion imaging help nuclear cardiology survive the test of time against conventional radiological techniques?
Caobelli F; Farina D; Pizzocaro C; Guerra UP
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Dec; 39(12):1970-2. PubMed ID: 22926711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Establishing the prognostic value of Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging: a step in the right direction.
Gibbons RJ; Chareonthaitawee P
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):855-7. PubMed ID: 19608136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rb-82 PET/CT left ventricular mass-to-volume ratios.
Tosh AV; Reichek N; Cooke CD; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28176182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography.
Lee JM; Kim CH; Koo BK; Hwang D; Park J; Zhang J; Tong Y; Jeon KH; Bang JI; Suh M; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Na SH; Ahn JM; Park SJ; Kim HS
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential.
Schindler TH
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):588-606. PubMed ID: 25637500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
