BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25459777)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness and practice variation in neonatal care.
    Lagatta J; Uhing M; Panepinto J
    Clin Perinatol; 2014 Dec; 41(4):833-45. PubMed ID: 25459777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
    Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current empirical research in neonatal bioethics.
    Swinton CH; Lantos JD
    Acta Paediatr; 2010 Dec; 99(12):1773-81. PubMed ID: 20712838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-enhanced neonatology practice evolution in an academic medical center. NICU Clinical Effectiveness Task Force.
    Myers TF; Venable HH; Hansen JA
    J Perinatol; 1998; 18(6 Pt 2 Su):S38-44. PubMed ID: 10023378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.
    Horbar JD
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):350-9. PubMed ID: 9917477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative effectiveness research in the United States: a progress report.
    Sullivan SD; Carlson JJ; Hansen RN
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):295-7. PubMed ID: 23227997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness research in practice: the Drug Effectiveness Review Project experience.
    VanLare JM; Wong HH; Gibbs J; Timp R; Whang S; Worrall C; Kelman J; Conway PH
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 24236793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving comparative effectiveness research into practice: implementation science and the role of academic medicine.
    Bonham AC; Solomon MZ
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1901-5. PubMed ID: 20921492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [National survey of transfusion practices in the neonatal period for the development of recommendations based on the "Haute Autorité de Santé methodology"].
    Wibaut B; Saliba E; Rakza T; Lassale B; Hubert H; Wiel E
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2012 Nov; 19(4-5):145-7. PubMed ID: 23043855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
    Blajchman MA; Carson JL; Eikelboom JW; Heddle NM; Lacroix J; Lauer MS; Platt R; Tilley B; Triulzi D; Vickers AJ; Yusuf S; Glynn S; Mondoro TH; Wagner E
    Transfusion; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1363-78. PubMed ID: 22486525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
    Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The implications of comparative effectiveness research for academic medicine.
    Rich EC; Bonham AC; Kirch DG
    Acad Med; 2011 Jun; 86(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 21512362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.
    French JA; England JD
    Neurology; 2010 Aug; 75(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 20697109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative-effectiveness research: does it matter?
    Cohen JP
    Clin Ther; 2013 Apr; 35(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 23523048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The current practice of neonatology in Malaysia.
    Boo NY
    Med J Malaysia; 1994 Mar; 49(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8057980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.