139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25459777)
21. Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice.
Timbie JW; Fox DS; Van Busum K; Schneider EC
Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Oct; 31(10):2168-75. PubMed ID: 23048092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
Kupersmith J; Ommaya AK
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. PubMed ID: 21184864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An introduction to comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Neurosurgery; 2012 Feb; 70(2):425-34; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 21849923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative effectiveness research: evidence-based medicine meets health care reform in the USA.
Tanenbaum SJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):976-84. PubMed ID: 20367695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.
Cornwell D; Hu M; Esposito D
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 25494569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].
Liao X; Xie YM; Tian F; Shen H
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 38(6):930-5. PubMed ID: 23717982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bench to trench: how evidence and guidelines shape health care policy and practice.
Francis DO
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Sep; 149(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 23715682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Perinatal medicine 2007 in Germany--anomie despite evidence?].
Vetter K
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2007 Jun; 211(3):108-9. PubMed ID: 17541876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Evidence-based health care].
del Llano Señarís JE; Meneu de Guillerna R
Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():90-6. PubMed ID: 10618806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Approaches to comparative effectiveness research in multimorbid populations.
Maciejewski ML; Bayliss EA
Med Care; 2014 Mar; 52 Suppl 3():S23-30. PubMed ID: 24561754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Practice variation in suspected neonatal sepsis: a costly problem in neonatal intensive care.
Spitzer AR; Kirkby S; Kornhauser M
J Perinatol; 2005 Apr; 25(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 15616610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Detection of bradycardia episodes in the "convalescent" newborn].
Boutté P; Bérard E; Dageville C
Arch Pediatr; 1994 Apr; 1(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 7842094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The principles and practice of evidence-based neonatology.
Soll RF; Andruscavage L
Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):215-24. PubMed ID: 9917465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A focus of care for neonatal nursing: the relationship between neonatal nursing practice and outcomes. Part 2.
Turrill S
Paediatr Nurs; 2003 Jun; 15(5):30-4. PubMed ID: 12830704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Eliminating Undesirable Variation in Neonatal Practice: Balancing Standardization and Customization.
Balakrishnan M; Raghavan A; Suresh GK
Clin Perinatol; 2017 Sep; 44(3):529-540. PubMed ID: 28802337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.
Huang GD; Ferguson RE; Peduzzi PN; O'Leary TJ
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. PubMed ID: 21184863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Off-label drugs prescription in neonatology: a physician's duty or a medical hazardous attitude?
d'Aloja E; Paribello F; Demontis R; Müller M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Oct; 24 Suppl 1():99-100. PubMed ID: 21942604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
