These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25460278)

  • 41. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
    Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Electroencephalographic Changes of Brain Oscillatory Activity After Upper Limb Somatic Sensation Training in a Patient With Somatosensory Deficit After Stroke.
    Gandolfi M; Formaggio E; Geroin C; Storti SF; Boscolo Galazzo I; Waldner A; Manganotti P; Smania N
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 46(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 25185438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Arm stiffness during assisted movement after stroke: the influence of visual feedback and training.
    Piovesan D; Morasso P; Giannoni P; Casadio M
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 May; 21(3):454-65. PubMed ID: 23193322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Adaptive training algorithm for robot-assisted upper-arm rehabilitation, applicable to individualised and therapeutic human-robot interaction.
    Chemuturi R; Amirabdollahian F; Dautenhahn K
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Sep; 10():102. PubMed ID: 24073670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of prolonged robot-assisted training on upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke.
    Duret C; Hutin E
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 23949029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Micera S; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 4():3. PubMed ID: 17309790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Performance based upper extremity training: a pilot study evaluation with the GENTLE/A rehabilitation system.
    Chemuturi R; Amirabdollahian F; Dautenhahn K
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650380. PubMed ID: 24187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study.
    Kuttuva M; Boian R; Merians A; Burdea G; Bouzit M; Lewis J; Fensterheim D
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2006 Apr; 9(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 16640468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke.
    Culmer PR; Jackson AE; Makower SG; Cozens JA; Levesley MC; Mon-Williams M; Bhakta B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Apr; 197(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21414360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bilateral assessment of functional tasks for robot-assisted therapy applications.
    Johnson MJ; Wang S; Bai P; Strachota E; Tchekanov G; Melbye J; McGuire J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2011 Oct; 49(10):1157-71. PubMed ID: 21881901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation.
    Gomez-Rodriguez M; Grosse-Wentrup M; Hill J; Gharabaghi A; Scholkopf B; Peters J
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975385. PubMed ID: 22275589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke.
    Reinkensmeyer DJ; Pang CT; Nessler JA; Painter CC
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Jun; 10(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 12236447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Robot-assisted humanized passive rehabilitation training based on online assessment and regulation.
    Pan L; Song A; Duan S; Xu B
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S655-64. PubMed ID: 26406061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Experimental Study on Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Training of Stroke Patients Based on Adaptive Task Level: A Preliminary Study.
    Pan L; Song A; Wang S; Duan S
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():2742595. PubMed ID: 30915351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stochastic estimation of arm mechanical impedance during robotic stroke rehabilitation.
    Palazzolo JJ; Ferraro M; Krebs HI; Lynch D; Volpe BT; Hogan N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Mar; 15(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17436881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis.
    Mazzoleni S; Sale P; Tiboni M; Franceschini M; Carrozza MC; Posteraro F
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 92(10 Suppl 2):e26-37. PubMed ID: 24052027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training.
    Hu XL; Tong KY; Song R; Zheng XJ; Lui KH; Leung WW; Ng S; Au-Yeung SS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):639-50. PubMed ID: 18490177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Test-retest reliability of robotic assessment measures for the evaluation of upper limb recovery.
    Colombo R; Cusmano I; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1020-9. PubMed ID: 24760936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On-line 'automatic pilot' training for hand and arm motor rehabilitation after stroke.
    Zeng J; Sun Y; Jiang L
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 Feb; 76(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 20971564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.