These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25461371)

  • 1. Modified cervicopexy: a novel, less-invasive technique for Stages III and IV uterine prolapse.
    Elsaman AM; Salem HT; Amin M; Fetih AN; Othman EE; Zahran KM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():159-63. PubMed ID: 25461371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anterior abdominal wall cervicopexy for treatment of stage III and stage IV uterine prolapse.
    Salem HT; Tawfik RM; El Saman AM; Nasr A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 110(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 20493488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.
    Diwan A; Rardin CR; Kohli N
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 15517676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Laparoscopic suture uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for uterine prolapse].
    Liang ZQ; Xu HC; Chen Y; Xiong GW; Chang Q; Zhang QY; He W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 39(10):666-8. PubMed ID: 16144562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
    Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication.
    de Boer TA; Milani AL; Kluivers KB; Withagen MI; Vierhout ME
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1313-9. PubMed ID: 19669686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uterus-Sparing Surgery: Outcomes of Transvaginal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy.
    Aserlind A; Garcia AN; Medina CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32387566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic cervicopexy for correction of apical genital prolapse in 10 steps: a pilot study.
    Paolo C; Alessandro A; Salucci P; Diego R; Renato S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 May; 32(5):1313-1316. PubMed ID: 32975602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic modified sacral hysteropexy: initial experience with an original surgical approach to uterovaginal prolapse.
    Lin L; Wang P; Wang Q; Yi T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 24291209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material--experience and results.
    Agarwala N; Hasiak N; Shade M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 17848318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraperitoneal high vaginal cuff suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: Results of a modified McCall technique from a longitudinal clinical study.
    Zilberlicht A; Dwyer PL; Karmakar D; Carswell F; Schierlitz L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 61(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33346932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.