These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25462036)

  • 21. Growing in circles: rearing environment alters spatial navigation in fish.
    Brown AA; Spetch ML; Hurd PL
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):569-73. PubMed ID: 17614863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.
    Hermer L; Spelke ES
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6484):57-9. PubMed ID: 8015605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size.
    Vallortigara G; Feruglio M; Sovrano VA
    Dev Sci; 2005 Sep; 8(5):393-401. PubMed ID: 16048511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wild, free-living rufous hummingbirds do not use geometric cues in a spatial task.
    Hornsby MA; Hurly TA; Hamilton CE; Pritchard DJ; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Oct; 108():138-41. PubMed ID: 25452077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. First Direct Evidence of Cue Integration in Reorientation: A New Paradigm.
    Twyman AD; Holden MP; Newcombe NS
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 3():923-936. PubMed ID: 29178140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Children reorient using the left/right sense of coloured landmarks at 18-24 months.
    Nardini M; Atkinson J; Burgess N
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):519-27. PubMed ID: 17379204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Environmental Geometry Aligns the Hippocampal Map during Spatial Reorientation.
    Keinath AT; Julian JB; Epstein RA; Muzzio IA
    Curr Biol; 2017 Feb; 27(3):309-317. PubMed ID: 28089516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation.
    Twyman AD; Newcombe NS; Gould TJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 2013 Apr; 55(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 22407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
    Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: II. Do pigeons (Columba livia) encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room?
    Kelley DM; Spetch ML
    J Comp Psychol; 2004 Dec; 118(4):384-95. PubMed ID: 15584775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spinning in the scanner: neural correlates of virtual reorientation.
    Sutton JE; Joanisse MF; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1097-107. PubMed ID: 20804287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation.
    Sovrano VA; Bisazza A; Vallortigara G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jul; 29(3):199-210. PubMed ID: 12884679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Children's use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory.
    Learmonth AE; Nadel L; Newcombe NS
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Jul; 13(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 12137136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Children's use of frames of reference in communication of spatial location.
    Craton LG; Elicker J; Plumert JM; Pick HL
    Child Dev; 1990 Oct; 61(5):1528-43. PubMed ID: 2245744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Of mice (Mus musculus) and toddlers (Homo sapiens): evidence for species-general spatial reorientation.
    Twyman AD; Newcombe NS; Gould TJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19685977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23370045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The potentiation of geometry by features in human children: Evidence against modularity in the domain of navigation.
    Lourenco SF; Cabrera J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Dec; 140():184-96. PubMed ID: 26254274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks.
    Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G
    Anim Cogn; 2010 May; 13(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 19960217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view.
    Ratliff KR; Newcombe NS
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1301-7. PubMed ID: 19121141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation.
    Sturz BR; Forloines MR; Bodily KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 22218783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.