151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25462313)
1. QSTR modeling for predicting aquatic toxicity of pharmacological active compounds in multiple test species for regulatory purpose.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Basant N
Chemosphere; 2015 Feb; 120():680-9. PubMed ID: 25462313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Kumar A; Mohan D
Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 May; 27(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 24738471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting aquatic toxicities of chemical pesticides in multiple test species using nonlinear QSTR modeling approaches.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 139():246-55. PubMed ID: 26142614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In silico prediction of toxicity of non-congeneric industrial chemicals using ensemble learning based modeling approaches.
Singh KP; Gupta S
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 275(3):198-212. PubMed ID: 24463095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemometric modeling of aquatic toxicity of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in Dugesia japonica and its interspecies correlation with daphnia and fish: QSTR and QSTTR approaches.
Hossain KA; Roy K
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Dec; 166():92-101. PubMed ID: 30253287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating sensory irritation potency of volatile organic chemicals using QSARs based on decision tree methods for regulatory purpose.
Gupta S; Basant N; Singh KP
Ecotoxicology; 2015 May; 24(4):873-86. PubMed ID: 25707485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling the toxicity of chemical pesticides in multiple test species using local and global QSTR approaches.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Toxicol Res (Camb); 2016 Jan; 5(1):340-353. PubMed ID: 30090350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary studies on model development for rodent toxicity and its interspecies correlation with aquatic toxicities of pharmaceuticals.
Das RN; Sanderson H; Mwambo AE; Roy K
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2013 Mar; 90(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 23238824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insights into pesticide toxicity against aquatic organism: QSTR models on Daphnia Magna.
He L; Xiao K; Zhou C; Li G; Yang H; Li Z; Cheng J
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 May; 173():285-292. PubMed ID: 30776561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting Toxicities of Diverse Chemical Pesticides in Multiple Avian Species Using Tree-Based QSAR Approaches for Regulatory Purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1337-48. PubMed ID: 26158470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ecotoxicological modelling of cosmetics for aquatic organisms: A QSTR approach.
Khan K; Roy K
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):567-594. PubMed ID: 28780892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of acute toxicity of emerging contaminants on the water flea Daphnia magna by Ant Colony Optimization-Support Vector Machine QSTR models.
Aalizadeh R; von der Ohe PC; Thomaidis NS
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):438-448. PubMed ID: 28234392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Support vector machine-based model for toxicity of organic compounds against fish.
Yu X
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104942. PubMed ID: 33940084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative inter-specific chemical activity relationships of pesticides in the aquatic environment.
Tremolada P; Finizio A; Villa S; Gaggi C; Vighi M
Aquat Toxicol; 2004 Mar; 67(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 15019253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fish embryo tests and acute fish toxicity tests are interchangeable in the application of the threshold approach.
Rawlings JM; Belanger SE; Connors KA; Carr GJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Mar; 38(3):671-681. PubMed ID: 30615221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ECOSAR model performance with a large test set of industrial chemicals.
Reuschenbach P; Silvani M; Dammann M; Warnecke D; Knacker T
Chemosphere; 2008 May; 71(10):1986-95. PubMed ID: 18262586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. QSTR modeling for qualitative and quantitative toxicity predictions of diverse chemical pesticides in honey bee for regulatory purposes.
Singh KP; Gupta S; Basant N; Mohan D
Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1504-15. PubMed ID: 25167463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hazard of pharmaceuticals for aquatic environment: Prioritization by structural approaches and prediction of ecotoxicity.
Sangion A; Gramatica P
Environ Int; 2016 Oct; 95():131-43. PubMed ID: 27568576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental properties and aquatic hazard assessment of anionic surfactants: physico-chemical, environmental fate and ecotoxicity properties.
Könnecker G; Regelmann J; Belanger S; Gamon K; Sedlak R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 Sep; 74(6):1445-60. PubMed ID: 21550112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
