BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

592 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2546321)

  • 1. [X-ray morphologic characteristics of microcalcination in benign processes and cancer of the breast].
    Zolotarevskiĭ VB; Zal'tsman IN; Kulakova AM
    Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 2546321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Needle localization and biopsy in non-palpable lesions of the breast: an eight-year experience.
    Laraja RD; Rothenberg RE; Herbert L; Pryce EH
    N Y State J Med; 1992 Feb; 92(2):71. PubMed ID: 1314357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Small focal lesions of the breast: a clinico-morphological analysis].
    Serov VV; Kuzin MI; Zolotarevskiĭ VB; Zal'tsman IN; Kulakova AM
    Arkh Patol; 1984; 46(9):25-32. PubMed ID: 6095796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
    Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
    Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An analysis of 136 groups of microcalcification of benign origin. How specific is the "triangle principle" (author's transl)].
    Lanyi M
    Rofo; 1982 Feb; 136(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 6284610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Information content of radiological signs of malignant and benign lesions of the breast in the mammogram].
    Hermanutz D; Linzbach C; Zerwas M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972 Sep; 117(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 4342579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease.
    Hansell DM; Cooke JC; Parsons CA; Evans SH; Dance DR; Bliss JM; Llesley I
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):21-5. PubMed ID: 2832028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Echomorphology of breast cancer].
    Teubner J; Bohrer M; van Kaick G; Georgi M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):277-86. PubMed ID: 8390702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biopsy for microcalcification detected by mammography.
    Roses DF; Harris MN; Gorstein F; Gumport SL
    Surgery; 1980 Mar; 87(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 6244682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitfalls in mammography screening policy: breast cancer in a 26-year-old patient.
    Castelo-Branco C; Gratacós E; Fernandez PL; Velasco M; Iglesias X; Fortuny A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8387938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The echo-dense edge and hyper-reflective spikes: sensitive criteria for malignant processes in breast ultrasound].
    Marquet KL; Funk A; Fendel H; Handt S
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 53(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 8382650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The differential diagnosis of microcalcification. Micro-cyst (blunt duct) adenosis (author's transl)].
    Lanyi M; Citoler P
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 6260608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
    Charpin C; Garcia S
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathologic correlation in mammographically directed breast biopsies.
    Symonds DA; Copeland BE; Drane A; Kaplan GN; Graham RR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jan; 116(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 1734830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of mammography based upon correlation of specimen mammograms and histopathologic findings.
    Fisher ER; Posada H; Ramos H
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1974 Jul; 62(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 4365737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of xeroradiography and histology of breast disease.
    D'Orsi CJ; Weissman BN; Berkowitz DM; Stay EJ
    CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1978; 11(1):75-119. PubMed ID: 225126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathologic considerations in the high-risk breast patient.
    Simmons R; Serafin D; McCarty K
    Clin Plast Surg; 1988 Oct; 15(4):655-65. PubMed ID: 2852084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Histopathology of the breast with reference to consultant studies. I. An analysis of 1,339 cases on the breast register of the Fulda Pathologic Institute].
    Bässler R; Schneider B; Scheidt E
    Pathologe; 1989 May; 10(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 2544865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.