136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25463467)
1. Face processing in the brains of pre-school aged children measured with MEG.
He W; Brock J; Johnson BW
Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():317-27. PubMed ID: 25463467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face-sensitive brain responses measured from a four-year-old child with a custom-sized child MEG system.
He W; Brock J; Johnson BW
J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():213-7. PubMed ID: 24295557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.
Xu Y; Liu J; Kanwisher N
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):588-97. PubMed ID: 15716149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A kiss is not a kiss: visually evoked neuromagnetic fields reveal differential sensitivities to brief presentations of kissing couples.
Cogan GB; Kirshenbaum SR; Walker J; Poeppel D
Neuroreport; 2015 Sep; 26(14):850-5. PubMed ID: 26287497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs).
Herrmann MJ; Ehlis AC; Ellgring H; Fallgatter AJ
J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2005 Aug; 112(8):1073-81. PubMed ID: 15583954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The 170ms Response to Faces as Measured by MEG (M170) Is Consistently Altered in Congenital Prosopagnosia.
Lueschow A; Weber JE; Carbon CC; Deffke I; Sander T; Grüter T; Grüter M; Trahms L; Curio G
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137624. PubMed ID: 26393348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognising upright and inverted faces: MEG source localisation.
Taylor MJ; Bayless SJ; Mills T; Pang EW
Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 1381():167-74. PubMed ID: 21238433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Steady-state visual-evoked response to upright and inverted geometrical faces: a magnetoencephalography study.
Tsuruhara A; Inui K; Kakigi R
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Mar; 562():19-23. PubMed ID: 24412129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus.
Deffke I; Sander T; Heidenreich J; Sommer W; Curio G; Trahms L; Lueschow A
Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1495-501. PubMed ID: 17363282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention.
Furey ML; Tanskanen T; Beauchamp MS; Avikainen S; Uutela K; Hari R; Haxby JV
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jan; 103(4):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16415158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The face-responsive M170 is modulated by sensor selection: An example of circularity in the analysis of MEG-data.
Tiedt HO; Lueschow A; Pauls A; Weber JE
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():137-40. PubMed ID: 27044803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural responses to rigidly moving faces displaying shifts in social attention investigated with fMRI and MEG.
Lee LC; Andrews TJ; Johnson SJ; Woods W; Gouws A; Green GG; Young AW
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):477-90. PubMed ID: 19833143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of face recognition; hippocampal and frontal lobe contributions determined with MEG.
Taylor MJ; Mills T; Pang EW
Brain Topogr; 2011 Oct; 24(3-4):261-70. PubMed ID: 21769697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A steady-state visual evoked potential approach to individual face perception: effect of inversion, contrast-reversal and temporal dynamics.
Rossion B; Prieto EA; Boremanse A; Kuefner D; Van Belle G
Neuroimage; 2012 Nov; 63(3):1585-600. PubMed ID: 22917988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
