27 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2546349)
1. Canadian experience in cytology proficiency testing.
Thompson DW
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):484-6. PubMed ID: 2546350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proficiency testing for cytologists.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 15830399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Weekly rescreening of 10% of the total cervical Papanicolaou smears: a worthwhile quality assurance scheme.
Sampatanukul P; Wannakrairot P; Promprakob U; Yodavudh S; Anansiriprapa C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Sep; 87 Suppl 2():S261-5. PubMed ID: 16083199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective.
Steiner C
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 2750437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-house quality assurance program in a state cytology laboratory.
Gardner NM
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 2750439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience in managing a large-scale rescreening of Papanicolaou smears and the pros and cons of measuring proficiency with visual and written examinations.
Rube IF
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):479-83. PubMed ID: 2546349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of proficiency testing in ensuring quality: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Howell LP; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Tworek J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23368860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The challenge of quality improvement with the Papanicolaou smear.
Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 9111111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rescreening in cervical cytology for quality control. When bad data is worse than no data or what works, what doesn't, and why.
Renshaw AA
Clin Lab Med; 2003 Sep; 23(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 14560535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
Tworek J; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Howell LP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The gynecologist's perspective of liability and quality issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
Greer BE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):246-9. PubMed ID: 9111109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
