These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25463553)

  • 1. Flexible cue combination in the guidance of attention in visual search.
    Brand J; Oriet C; Johnson AP; Wolfe JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():129-38. PubMed ID: 25463553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.
    Hodsoll J; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):918-26. PubMed ID: 11521856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conjunction search is relational: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Becker SI; Harris AM; York A; Choi J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1828-1842. PubMed ID: 28967786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The spatial dynamics of mouse-tracking reveal that attention capture is stimulus-driven rather than contingent upon top-down goals.
    Dieciuc MA; Roque NA; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1285-1290. PubMed ID: 31259583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets.
    Humphrey DG; Kramer AF
    Psychol Aging; 1997 Dec; 12(4):704-17. PubMed ID: 9416638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contingent capture in cueing: the role of color search templates and cue-target color relations.
    Ansorge U; Becker SI
    Psychol Res; 2014 Mar; 78(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 23807453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of linear separability in visual search for color suggests a role of recognizability.
    Kong G; Alais D; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1724-1738. PubMed ID: 27322635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual target search: Attention tuned to relative features, both within and across feature dimensions.
    York AA; Sewell DK; Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1368-1386. PubMed ID: 32881554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search for color and shape: when is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values?
    Becker SI; Harris AM; Venini D; Retell JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):264-91. PubMed ID: 23875572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):86-101. PubMed ID: 25485665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The guidance of spatial attention during visual search for color combinations and color configurations.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1282-96. PubMed ID: 26962846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Lien MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1104-20. PubMed ID: 26854530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bottom-up guidance to grouped items in conjunction search: evidence for color grouping.
    Anderson GM; Heinke D; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 22138335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.