These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2546431)
1. Biocompatible implants in tympanoplasty. Emmett JR Am J Otol; 1989 May; 10(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 2546431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Biocompatible ossicle prosthesis of Proplast and Plastipore. Comparative study in tympanoplasties apropos of 200 cases]. Portmann M; Bébéar JP; Bagot d'Arc M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1982; 103(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 6896763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Histopathologic findings on proplast and plastipore prostheses]. Colletti V; Fiorino GF; Sittoni V Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1984; 4(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 6534054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Our experience with ossicular prostheses of Ceravital]. Gersdorff M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1985; 106(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 3834549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ossiculoplasty with composite prostheses. PORP and TORP. Goldenberg RA Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 27(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 7984372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of autograft and homograft TORP and PORP in the reconstruction of the conductive system in the middle ear. Betow C Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 4025531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ceramics in tympanoplasty. Wullstein SR Am J Otol; 1985 Jan; 6(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 2983561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of the clinical results obtained by means of Plastipore and ceramic ossicular prosthesis and bone allografts. Gersdorff MC; Maisin JP; Munting E Am J Otol; 1986 Jul; 7(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 3526913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current use of implants in middle ear surgery. Goldenberg RA; Emmet JR Otol Neurotol; 2001 Mar; 22(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11300260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reconstruction of the stapes superstructure with bioactive ceramics]. Reide W; Dost P; Missfeldt N; Heine J; Jahnke K HNO; 1993 Mar; 41(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8386153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue response to Plasti-Pore and Proplast otologic implants in the middle ears of cats. Teichgraeber JF; Spector M; Per-Lee JH; Jackson RT Am J Otol; 1983 Oct; 5(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 6359894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioactive ceramics versus proplast implants in ossiculoplasty. Babighian G Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 3839631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced biofunctionality of plastipore ossicular prostheses with the use of homologous cartilage. Sanna M; Gamoletti R; Magnani M; Bacciu S; Zini C Am J Otol; 1982 Oct; 4(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 7149005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chin augmentation with various alloplastic materials: a comparative study. Moenning JE; Wolford LM Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1989; 4(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 2561746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is hydroxyapatite ceramic an adequate biomaterial in ossicular chain reconstruction? Hörmann K; Donath K Am J Otol; 1987 Sep; 8(5):402-5. PubMed ID: 2825527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plastipore ossicular prostheses. A histological evaluation. Gamoletti R; Bellomi A; Sanna M; Zini C ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1984; 46(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6700961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ceravital versus plastipore in tympanoplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Mangham CA; Lindeman RC Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Feb; 99(2 Pt 1):112-6. PubMed ID: 2301864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]