BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25465396)

  • 21. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
    Kerzel D; Barras C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distractor effects on pointing: the role of spatial layout.
    Fischer MH; Adam JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Feb; 136(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 11291731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
    Chen Z
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bottom-up attention capture with distractor and target singletons defined in the same (color) dimension is not a matter of feature uncertainty.
    Weichselbaum H; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 29777515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oculomotor capture by irrelevant onsets with and without color contrast.
    Becker SI; Lewis AJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():60-71. PubMed ID: 25708201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus.
    Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun; 119(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 15877977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual search for color and shape: when is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values?
    Becker SI; Harris AM; Venini D; Retell JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):264-91. PubMed ID: 23875572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reward- and attention-related biasing of sensory selection in visual cortex.
    Buschschulte A; Boehler CN; Strumpf H; Stoppel C; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):1049-65. PubMed ID: 24345176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: singleton vs. multiple distractors.
    Smith ES; Crawford TJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jul; 242(7):1745-1759. PubMed ID: 38819649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.
    Heath M; DeSimone JC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 27405998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Responses of intraparietal neurons to saccadic targets and visual distractors.
    Platt ML; Glimcher PW
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Sep; 78(3):1574-89. PubMed ID: 9310444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How do we select multiple features? Transient costs for selecting two colors rather than one, persistent costs for color-location conjunctions.
    Lo SY; Holcombe AO
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):304-21. PubMed ID: 24249221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.