These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25465905)

  • 1. Failure of a polyether-ether-ketone expandable interbody cage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Stein IC; Than KD; Chen KS; Wang AC; Park P
    Eur Spine J; 2015 May; 24 Suppl 4():S555-9. PubMed ID: 25465905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Alvi MA; Kurian SJ; Wahood W; Goyal A; Elder BD; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():596-606.e1. PubMed ID: 30954733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Static Versus Expandable Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Interbody Cages: A Comparison of One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Canseco JA; Karamian BA; DiMaria SL; Patel PD; Divi SN; Chang M; Timmons T; Grewal L; Hallman H; Lee JK; Kaye ID; Woods BI; Kurd MF; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e492-e501. PubMed ID: 34098137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extrusion of expandable stacked interbody device for lumbar fusion: case report of a complication.
    Kim PD; Baron EM; Levesque M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):E1155-8. PubMed ID: 22498990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgical Treatment for Posterior Migration of Polyetheretherketone Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage: Case Series.
    Telfeian AE; Oyelese A; Fridley J; Gokaslan ZL
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Mar; 147():e437-e443. PubMed ID: 33359521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices: a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome.
    Jiya T; Smit T; Deddens J; Mullender M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 19179917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Technology: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 50 Patients.
    Kim CW; Doerr TM; Luna IY; Joshua G; Shen SR; Fu X; Wu AM
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():228-235. PubMed ID: 26921700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
    Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additional sagittal correction can be obtained when using an expandable titanium interbody device in lumbar Smith-Peterson osteotomies: a biomechanical study.
    Qandah NA; Klocke NF; Synkowski JJ; Chinthakunta SR; Hussain MM; Salloum KG; Marvin EA; Bucklen BS
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 25315134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF; Peterson MD; Parker SR; Roush TF; Bundy JV; Turner AW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.
    Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expandable vs Static Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic Comparison of Segmental and Lumbar Sagittal Angles.
    Yee TJ; Joseph JR; Terman SW; Park P
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Jul; 81(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 28368542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion surgery: Series of cases and literature review.
    Pan FM; Wang SJ; Yong ZY; Liu XM; Huang YF; Wu DS
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jun; 30():56-62. PubMed ID: 27107661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of 1070 cases.
    Kimura H; Shikata J; Odate S; Soeda T; Yamamura S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):1164-9. PubMed ID: 22647991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.
    Dorward IG; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; OʼLeary PT; Stoker GE; Pahys JM; Kang MM; Sides BA; Koester LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E755-62. PubMed ID: 23442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.