BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

817 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25466942)

  • 1. Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
    Hamoen EHJ; de Rooij M; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 25466942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
    Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis of use of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS V2) with multiparametric MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer.
    Zhang L; Tang M; Chen S; Lei X; Zhang X; Huan Y
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5204-5214. PubMed ID: 28656462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
    Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
    World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate Cancer: The European Society of Urogenital Radiology Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension by Using 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging.
    Kayat Bittencourt L; Litjens G; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Turkbey B; Gasparetto EL; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):479-89. PubMed ID: 25848900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
    Woo S; Suh CH; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 28196723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection and Prediction of Prostate Cancer.
    Wang R; Wang H; Zhao C; Hu J; Jiang Y; Tong Y; Liu T; Huang R; Wang X
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130207. PubMed ID: 26067423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wadera A; Alabousi M; Pozdnyakov A; Kashif Al-Ghita M; Jafri A; McInnes MD; Schieda N; van der Pol CB; Salameh JP; Samoilov L; Gusenbauer K; Alabousi A
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20191050. PubMed ID: 33002371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study.
    Hoeks CM; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Roobol MJ; Bul M; Hambrock T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 24220253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
    Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) is of additional predictive value in patients with PI-RADS grade III (intermediate) lesions in the MR-guided re-biopsy setting for prostate cancer.
    Kaufmann S; Bedke J; Gatidis S; Hennenlotter J; Kramer U; Notohamiprodjo M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Kruck S
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 26267808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial.
    Boschheidgen M; Albers P; Schlemmer HP; Hellms S; Bonekamp D; Sauter A; Hadaschik B; Krilaviciute A; Radtke JP; Seibold P; Lakes J; Arsov C; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K; Makowski M; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Harke N; Debus J; Körber SA; Benner A; Kristiansen G; Giesel FL; Antoch G; Kaaks R; Becker N; Schimmöller L
    Eur Urol; 2024 Feb; 85(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37863727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of diagnostic performance between two prostate imaging reporting and data system versions: A systematic review.
    Li W; Xin C; Zhang L; Dong A; Xu H; Wu Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():111-119. PubMed ID: 31005160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard.
    Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Lanzman RS; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3185-90. PubMed ID: 23756958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
    Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
    BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting.
    Grey AD; Chana MS; Popert R; Wolfe K; Liyanage SH; Acher PL
    BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 25041307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla.
    Roethke MC; Kuru TH; Schultze S; Tichy D; Kopp-Schneider A; Fenchel M; Schlemmer HP; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Feb; 24(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 24196383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.