These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25467224)

  • 1. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
    Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET.
    Yan J; Chu-Shern JL; Loi HY; Khor LK; Sinha AK; Quek ST; Tham IW; Townsend D
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1667-73. PubMed ID: 26229145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
    Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study.
    Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishida H; Nishio T; Ohnishi A; Maebatake A; Sasaki M; Senda M
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26271802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
    Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
    Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of reconstruction algorithms on semi-quantitative measurements in
    Özülker F; Babacan GB; Cengiz S; Özülker T
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2024; 27(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 39097805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
    Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in
    Hofheinz F; Apostolova I; Oehme L; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 28473598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes of [
    Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.
    Akamatsu G; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24144448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
    Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
    Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials.
    Weber WA; Gatsonis CA; Mozley PD; Hanna LG; Shields AF; Aberle DR; Govindan R; Torigian DA; Karp JS; Yu JQ; Subramaniam RM; Halvorsen RA; Siegel BA; ;
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1137-43. PubMed ID: 25908829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
    Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
    Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of point spread function reconstruction on quantitative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging parameters and inter-reader reproducibility in solid tumors.
    Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Wray R; Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Subramaniam RM
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Mar; 37(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26650959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of (18)F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR.
    Rasmussen JH; Fischer BM; Aznar MC; Hansen AE; Vogelius IR; Löfgren J; Andersen FL; Loft A; Kjaer A; Højgaard L; Specht L
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 88(1048):20140655. PubMed ID: 25634069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
    Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis.
    Kuhnert G; Boellaard R; Sterzer S; Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Wolf J; Dietlein M; Drzezga A; Kobe C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):249-258. PubMed ID: 26280981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.