BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25467225)

  • 1. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking with harmonic phase imaging analysis (CSPAMM) for assessment of global and regional diastolic function.
    Kuetting D; Sprinkart AM; Doerner J; Schild H; Thomas D
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 25467225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for systolic and diastolic strain and strain rate calculation with spatial modulation of magnetization imaging analysis.
    Moody WE; Taylor RJ; Edwards NC; Chue CD; Umar F; Taylor TJ; Ferro CJ; Young AA; Townend JN; Leyva F; Steeds RP
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1000-12. PubMed ID: 24677420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking with CSPAMM HARP for the assessment of global and regional layer specific strain.
    Kuetting DLR; Feisst A; Dabir D; Homsi R; Sprinkart AM; Luetkens J; Schild HH; Thomas DK
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 244():340-346. PubMed ID: 28624332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter-study reproducibility of left ventricular torsion and torsion rate quantification using MR myocardial feature tracking.
    Kowallick JT; Morton G; Lamata P; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Lotz J; Hasenfuß G; Nagel E; Chiribiri A; Schuster A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):128-37. PubMed ID: 26114731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of systolic and diastolic function in patients with LGE negative systemic amyloidosis using CMR.
    Kuetting DL; Homsi R; Sprinkart AM; Luetkens J; Thomas DK; Schild HH; Dabir D
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 232():336-341. PubMed ID: 28153537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking and 2D/3D echocardiography speckle tracking for evaluation of global left ventricular strain.
    Obokata M; Nagata Y; Wu VC; Kado Y; Kurabayashi M; Otsuji Y; Takeuchi M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 17(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 26377901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Off-resonance insensitive complementary SPAtial Modulation of Magnetization (ORI-CSPAMM) for quantification of left ventricular twist.
    Reyhan M; Natsuaki Y; Ennis DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 23625854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.
    Schuster A; Morton G; Hussain ST; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Asrress KN; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Perera D; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 23246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of myocardial deformation by deformable registration-based analysis of cine MRI: validation with tagged CMR.
    Lamacie MM; Houbois CP; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Thavendiranathan P; Wintersperger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3658-3668. PubMed ID: 30770973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of extracellular contrast agent (Gadobutrol) on the precision and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking.
    Kuetting DL; Dabir D; Homsi R; Sprinkart AM; Luetkens J; Schild HH; Thomas DK
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 May; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 27209219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking.
    Aurich M; Keller M; Greiner S; Steen H; Aus dem Siepen F; Riffel J; Katus HA; Buss SJ; Mereles D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left ventricular function and regional strain with subtly-tagged steady-state free precession feature tracking.
    Schrauben EM; Cowan BR; Greiser A; Young AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):787-797. PubMed ID: 28722247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of cardiac dyssynchrony by cardiac MR: A comparison of velocity encoding and feature tracking analysis.
    Kuetting DL; Sprinkart AM; Dabir D; Schild HH; Thomas DK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):940-6. PubMed ID: 26426814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting.
    Morais P; Marchi A; Bogaert JA; Dresselaers T; Heyde B; D'hooge J; Bogaert J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of myocardial tagging and feature tracking in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Schneeweis C; Lapinskas T; Schnackenburg B; Berger A; Hucko T; Kelle S; Fleck E; Gebker R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 25803969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle.
    Schmidt B; Dick A; Treutlein M; Schiller P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baeßler B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():97-105. PubMed ID: 28267556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.
    Augustine D; Lewandowski AJ; Lazdam M; Rai A; Francis J; Myerson S; Noble A; Becher H; Neubauer S; Petersen SE; Leeson P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 23331550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of global myocardial function by cine MRI deformable registration-based analysis: Comparison with MR feature tracking and speckle-tracking echocardiography.
    Lamacie MM; Thavendiranathan P; Hanneman K; Greiser A; Jolly MP; Ward R; Wintersperger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 27491873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of flip angle optimization on the precision and reproducibility of feature tracking derived strain assessment in contrast enhanced bSSFP cine images.
    Kuetting DLR; Feisst A; Dabir D; Luetkens J; Homsi R; Thomas D; Schild HH; Sprinkart AM
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():9-14. PubMed ID: 29685551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
    Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.