183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25467289)
1. Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with a Scheimpflug based device.
Lanza M; Cennamo M; Iaccarino S; Romano V; Bifani M; Irregolare C; Lanza A
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 25467289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones.
Lanza M; Cennamo M; Iaccarino S; Irregolare C; Rechichi M; Bifani M; Gironi Carnevale UA
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():748671. PubMed ID: 25054144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reproducibility of Scheimpflug Tomography Measurements Regarding Corneal Front and Back Surface Power].
Stavridis E; Eppig T; Szentmáry N; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Nov; 232(11):1297-303. PubMed ID: 26575536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes.
Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Cennamo M; Irregolare C; Romano V; Carnevale UA
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 25467287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST].
Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Central and peripheral corneal pachymetry--standard evaluation with the Pentacam system].
Rüfer F; Schröder A; Arvani MK; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 15719315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Central corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes with three different optical devices.
Lanza M; Paolillo E; Gironi Carnevale UA; Lanza A; Irregolare C; Mele L; Bifani M
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Dec; 38(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 26048662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients.
Valbon BF; Ambrósio R; Fontes BM; Luz A; Roberts CJ; Alves MR
J Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 30(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 24877553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Bons JP; Hossain A; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 28407167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of the human anterior segment in normal Chinese subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.
Wang X; Wu Q
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):703-8. PubMed ID: 23260258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and repeatability of keratometric and corneal power measurements obtained by Orbscan II, Pentacam, and Galilei corneal tomography systems.
Crawford AZ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 23540708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices.
Anayol MA; Güler E; Yağci R; Şekeroğlu MA; Ylmazoğlu M; Trhş H; Kulak AE; Ylmazbaş P
Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 24763122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry.
Hon Y; Lam AK
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 90(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 23238261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
