307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25468631)
21. Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1494-9. PubMed ID: 16182918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Choung PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992; 20(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 1629365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy.
Kobayashi A; Yoshimasu H; Kobayashi J; Amagasa T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 64(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 16631484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison of effect of the mandible setbacked by SSRO and IVRO on gnathostomatic system].
Yang X; Dong Y; Li Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 May; 35(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 11780218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study.
Kung AYH; Leung YY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Changes in occlusal force after mandibular ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 36(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 17239561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse.
Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of an innovative computer-assisted sagittal split ramus osteotomy to reduce neurosensory alterations following orthognathic surgery: a pilot study.
Al-Ahmad HT; M Saleh MW; Hussein AM
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 23754821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
Tabrizi R; Pakshir H; Behnia H; Akhlaghi S; Shahsavari N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Liang SW; Chen PH; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 34327588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery.
Ueki K; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Degerliyurt K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):486-91. PubMed ID: 18280381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1360-71. PubMed ID: 25871900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postoperative stability of bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation: a frontal cephalometric study.
Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Takagi R; Saito C; Saito I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):992-8. PubMed ID: 18621507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgery-first approach on patients with temporomandibular joint disease by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Park KR; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):e429-36. PubMed ID: 22771403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Complications of surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism].
Gaszyńska E; Kozakiewicz M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jul; 25(145):27-31. PubMed ID: 18839610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of upper lip hypoesthesia with a trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with mandibular osteotomy.
Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Yoshida K; Hashiba Y; Shimizu C; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 17234530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tongue-palatal contact changes in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an electropalatography study.
Kojima S; Kaku M; Yamamoto I; Yasuhara Y; Sumi H; Yamamoto T; Yashima Y; Izumino J; Nakajima K; Nagano Y; Kono M; Yoshimura A; Ueasa M; Tanimoto K
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 44(9):673-682. PubMed ID: 28581686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effectiveness of piezoelectric surgery in reducing surgical complications after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Shirota T; Kamatani T; Yamaguchi T; Ogura H; Maki K; Shintani S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 52(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 24388635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary-mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise.
Ohba S; Tasaki H; Tobita T; Minamizato T; Kawasaki T; Motooka N; Watanabe E; Yoshida N; Asahina I
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 23347885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy used to correct Class III malocclusion: review of the literature.
Costa F; Robiony M; Politi M
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11482290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
