These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25470450)
1. The social value requirement reconsidered. Wertheimer A Bioethics; 2015 Jun; 29(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 25470450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is payment a benefit? Wertheimer A Bioethics; 2013 Feb; 27(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 21726261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentists and pseudo-patients: further meditations on deception in research. Newton LH IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical? Dyck M; Allen G J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moral dilemmas in nursing research. Clarke J Nurs Pract; 1991; 4(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 1845383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Putting the "ethics" into "research ethics". Spike J Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):51-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Ethics and clinical research" revisited. A tribute to Henry K. Beecher. Katz J Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(5):31-9. PubMed ID: 8262768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defending the social value of knowledge as a safeguard for public trust. Holzer FS Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):559-567. PubMed ID: 28786174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IRBs and the long-term social implications of research. de Melo-Martin I Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 21534145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees. Atici E; Erdemir AD J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice. London AJ Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. How not to rethink research ethics. Beauchamp TL Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical imperialism and informed consent. Newton LH IRB; 1990; 12(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 11659442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Designing a disconnect? White GB Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 21534144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to withdraw from research. Schaefer GO; Wertheimer A Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2010 Dec; 20(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 21338028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Medical Research Council's new guidelines on research involving human subjects: too much law, too little ethics. Hoffmaster B Health Law Can; 1989; 10(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 10313310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rethinking research ethics. Rhodes R Am J Bioeth; 2010 Oct; 10(10):19-36. PubMed ID: 20945264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of social, cultural, and economic contexts, and empirical research in examining "undue inducement". Klitzman R Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):19-21. PubMed ID: 16179300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Author response to letter regarding "Children in clinical research: a conflict of moral values" (AJOB 3:1). Sharav VH Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]