172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25470813)
1. Science and scholarship: ten volumes of the Journal Hospital Medicine.
Auerbach A
J Hosp Med; 2015 Jan; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 25470813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Journal of Hospital Medicine in 2014 and beyond.
Auerbach AD
J Hosp Med; 2014 Jan; 9(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 24390822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. JHM 2.0: The Journal of Hospital Medicine at its first transition.
Auerbach AD
J Hosp Med; 2012 Jan; 7(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22105981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers.
Callaham M; McCulloch C
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 57(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21074894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial introspection: problems of a successful peer reviewed journal.
Rossdale PD
Equine Vet J; 1998 Jan; 30(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 9480209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review: what is it all about?
Parish LC
Skinmed; 2008; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 18174794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology.
Brock WJ
Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital medicine in 2015: Remarkable successes and a crucial crossroads.
Wachter RM
J Hosp Med; 2015 Dec; 10(12):830-1. PubMed ID: 26097222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.
Balistreri WF
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A reviewer's lot is not a happy one.
Raine CS
J Neuroimmunol; 2003 Aug; 141(1-2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12965247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New Year's Resolutions-New Year Reviewers-New Year of Review.
Woodruff TK
Endocrinology; 2019 Jan; 160(1):36-37. PubMed ID: 30551172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Welcome Message from the New Editor-in-Chief.
Zemel MB
J Med Food; 2019 Mar; 22(3):229. PubMed ID: 30844320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it".
Jones V
Medscape J Med; 2009; 11(1):17; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 19295938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Journal peer review.
N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The process of a peer-reviewed journal.
Pearson GS
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance].
Kudaiberdieva G
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Web manuscript submission and tracking system for peer review. The journal moves with the time.
Schroeder TV; Beard JD
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 23(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 11863324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perfecting peer review?
Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
Muir-Cochrane E
Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
