These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25471299)

  • 1. Randomization inference for treatment effects on a binary outcome.
    Rigdon J; Hudgens MG
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):924-35. PubMed ID: 25471299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On exact randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals.
    Fiksel J
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38837900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sharp nonparametric bounds and randomization inference for treatment effects on an ordinal outcome.
    Chiba Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(25):3966-3975. PubMed ID: 28703430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect on a binary outcome.
    Li X; Ding P
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 26833798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constructing a confidence interval for the fraction who benefit from treatment, using randomized trial data.
    Huang EJ; Fang EX; Hanley DF; Rosenblum M
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1228-1239. PubMed ID: 31206586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomization inference with general interference and censoring.
    Loh WW; Hudgens MG; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):235-245. PubMed ID: 31388990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomization-based confidence intervals for cluster randomized trials.
    Rabideau DJ; Wang R
    Biostatistics; 2021 Oct; 22(4):913-927. PubMed ID: 32112077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.
    Agresti A; Bini M; Bertaccini B; Ryu E
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1270-5. PubMed ID: 18266891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining one-sample confidence procedures for inference in the two-sample case.
    Fay MP; Proschan MA; Brittain E
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 25274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stratified exact tests for the weak causal null hypothesis in randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):986-997. PubMed ID: 28605047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous confidence intervals using ordinal effect measures for ordered categorical outcomes.
    Ryu E
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3179-88. PubMed ID: 19691062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Furukawa TA
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):337-347. PubMed ID: 31399994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of methods for estimating the causal effect of a treatment in randomized clinical trials subject to noncompliance.
    Little RJ; Long Q; Lin X
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):640-9. PubMed ID: 18510650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomization-based interval estimation in randomized clinical trials.
    Wang Y; Rosenberger WF
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2843-2854. PubMed ID: 32491198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.
    Schaarschmidt F; Biesheuvel E; Hothorn LA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):292-310. PubMed ID: 19212881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means by computer-intensive tests.
    Ludbrook J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Nov; 65(11):812-9. PubMed ID: 7487733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.