These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25472425)
41. Patients' satisfaction with the healthcare services at a north central Nigerian tertiary hospital. Adekanye AO; Adefemi SA; Okuku AG; Onawola KA; Adeleke IT; James JA Niger J Med; 2013; 22(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 24180151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. How effective is the new community-based Welsh low vision service? Court H; Ryan B; Bunce C; Margrain TH Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 95(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 20601662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Development, testing, and validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in the clinical genetics setting. Zellerino B; Milligan SA; Brooks R; Freedenberg DL; Collingridge DS; Williams MS Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2009 Aug; 151C(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 19621441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. NAPWA urges expanded role in assessing client satisfaction. AIDS Policy Law; 1999 May; 14(9):4. PubMed ID: 11366966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Patient satisfaction with Peninsula Optometry Community Glaucoma Scheme. Levy S; Booth A Eye (Lond); 2015 Oct; 29(10):1395. PubMed ID: 25998943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Involving clients in programme evaluation and research: a new methodology for occupational therapy. Clark C; Scott E; Krupa T Can J Occup Ther; 1993 Oct; 60(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 10129021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development of a consumer experience reporting questionnaire for residential aged care homes in Australia. Wells Y; Fetherstonhaugh D; Solly KN Australas J Ageing; 2019 Dec; 38(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 31016865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Residents' satisfaction with multi-purpose services. Anderson JK; Rae JB; Grenade LE; Boldy DP Aust Health Rev; 2008 May; 32(2):349-55. PubMed ID: 18447826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Commentary on: What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons. Eaves FF Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):762-6. PubMed ID: 22859549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Commentary on: What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons. Jewell ML Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):760-1. PubMed ID: 22859548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. What do patients want? Technical quality versus functional quality: a literature review for plastic surgeons. Fiala TG Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):751-9. PubMed ID: 22859547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Elderly patients' satisfaction with hospital care. Bene J; Liston R; Nelson L; Devine MJ; Banerjee AK J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1998; 32(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 9597630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Why are people dissatisfied with medical care services in Lithuania? A qualitative study using responses to open-ended questions. Bankauskaite V; Saarelma O Int J Qual Health Care; 2003 Feb; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12630798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Is there room for improvement in the Icelandic health care system?[Editorial]]. Armannsson G Laeknabladid; 2017 Mars; 103(3):115. PubMed ID: 28262627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Devising a multidisciplinary audit tool. Bell L; Morris B; Brown RB Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1993; 6(4):16-21. PubMed ID: 10131448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Marketing to older patients: perceptions of service quality. Brand RR; Cronin JJ; Routledge JB Health Mark Q; 1997; 15(2):1-31. PubMed ID: 10179448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Measuring outcomes of community aged care programs: challenges, opportunities and the Australian Community Outcomes Measurement ACCOM tool. Cardona B Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 May; 16(1):104. PubMed ID: 29843723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]