211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25473187)
1. Screening polypectomy rates below quality benchmarks: a prospective study.
Sewitch MJ; Jiang M; Fon Sing M; Barkun A; Joseph L
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 20(43):16300-5. PubMed ID: 25473187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia.
Beaulieu D; Barkun A; Martel M
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3551-7. PubMed ID: 22826619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality.
Jiang M; Sewitch MJ; Barkun AN; Joseph L; Hilsden RJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2013 May; 13():78. PubMed ID: 23638769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different screening definitions have little impact on polypectomy rate estimates.
Jiang M; Sewitch MJ; Joseph L; Barkun AN
Can J Gastroenterol; 2012 Nov; 26(11):791-4. PubMed ID: 23166901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of colonoscopy and advances in detection of colorectal lesions: a current overview.
Wanders LK; van Doorn SC; Fockens P; Dekker E
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Apr; 9(4):417-30. PubMed ID: 25467213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
Johnson MR; Grubber J; Grambow SC; Maciejewski ML; Dunn-Thomas T; Provenzale D; Fisher DA
Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 26122143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.
Hassan C; Quintero E; Dumonceau JM; Regula J; Brandão C; Chaussade S; Dekker E; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Ferlitsch M; Gimeno-García A; Hazewinkel Y; Jover R; Kalager M; Loberg M; Pox C; Rembacken B; Lieberman D;
Endoscopy; 2013 Oct; 45(10):842-51. PubMed ID: 24030244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forceps versus snare polypectomies in colorectal cancer screening: are we adhering to the guidelines?
Britto-Arias M; Waldmann E; Jeschek P; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Bannert C; Weber M; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch A; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):898-902. PubMed ID: 26115462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of implementation strategies on adherence rates to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines after polypectomy in a university hospital].
Zimmer B; Felber J; Lehmann M; Brenk-Franz K; Petersen I; Stallmach A
Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1157-64. PubMed ID: 24122376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Post-Polypectomy Surveillance That Would Please Goldilocks--Not Too Much, Not Too Little, but Just Right.
Ladabaum U; Schoen RE
Gastroenterology; 2016 Apr; 150(4):791-6. PubMed ID: 26850494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Colonoscopy quality control as a requirement of colorectal cancer screening].
Quintero E; Alarcón-Fernández O; Jover R
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Nov; 36(9):597-605. PubMed ID: 23769425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.
Hilsden RJ; Rose SM; Dube C; Rostom A; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Aug; 114(8):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 30848731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database.
Williams JE; Holub JL; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):576-82. PubMed ID: 22341104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
Jover R; Herráiz M; Alarcón O; Brullet E; Bujanda L; Bustamante M; Campo R; Carreño R; Castells A; Cubiella J; García-Iglesias P; Hervás AJ; Menchén P; Ono A; Panadés A; Parra-Blanco A; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Quintero E; Reñé JM; Sánchez del Río A; Seoane A; Serradesanferm A; Soriano Izquierdo A; Vázquez Sequeiros E; ;
Endoscopy; 2012 Apr; 44(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 22438159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence: Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer.
Patel N; Tong L; Ahn C; Singal AG; Gupta S
Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Oct; 60(10):2937-45. PubMed ID: 25947332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.
Williams JE; Le TD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 20970795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
