These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25473863)
1. What exactly did you claim? Häyry M Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Jan; 24(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 25473863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The moral status of babies. McGee A J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 23637450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva. Beard M; Lynch S J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e1-4. PubMed ID: 23637453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pro-Life Arguments Against Infanticide and Why they are Not Convincing. Räsänen J Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 27717058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva. Manninen BA J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 23637447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion, infanticide and moral context. Porter L J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):350-2. PubMed ID: 23637451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva. Camosy C J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 23637431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The moral significance of being born. Levy N J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 23637446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Viable Violinist. Hawking M Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 26423668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quo vadis, bioethics. Glick SM; Jotkowitz AB Isr Med Assoc J; 2012 Sep; 14(9):535-7. PubMed ID: 23101414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infanticide and moral consistency. McMahan J J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 23637426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva. Beckwith FJ J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 23637449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper. Mori M J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 23637439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reflections from a troubled stream: Giubilini and Minerva on "after-birth abortion". Hauskeller M Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 22777974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'. Rini RA J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 23637452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals. Finnis J J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):281-3. PubMed ID: 23637427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infanticide and madness. George RP J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 23637432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Killing fetuses and killing newborns. Di Nucci E J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discussing infanticide. Singer P J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):260. PubMed ID: 23637423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Response to: is the pro-choice position for infanticide 'madness'? George RP J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):302. PubMed ID: 23637434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]