550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25474098)
1. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.
Hicks JL; Uchida TK; Seth A; Rajagopal A; Delp SL
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Feb; 137(2):020905. PubMed ID: 25474098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models.
Lund ME; de Zee M; Andersen MS; Rasmussen J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Feb; 226(2):82-94. PubMed ID: 22468460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An improved inverse dynamics formulation for estimation of external and internal loads during human sagittal plane movements.
Blajer W; Dziewiecki K; Mazur Z
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 23758087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Design and validation of a general purpose robotic testing system for musculoskeletal applications.
Noble LD; Colbrunn RW; Lee DG; van den Bogert AJ; Davis BL
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):025001. PubMed ID: 20370251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics.
Millard M; Uchida T; Seth A; Delp SL
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Feb; 135(2):021005. PubMed ID: 23445050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization.
Sartori M; Farina D; Lloyd DG
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(15):3613-21. PubMed ID: 25458151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement.
Seth A; Hicks JL; Uchida TK; Habib A; Dembia CL; Dunne JJ; Ong CF; DeMers MS; Rajagopal A; Millard M; Hamner SR; Arnold EM; Yong JR; Lakshmikanth SK; Sherman MA; Ku JP; Delp SL
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1006223. PubMed ID: 30048444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer modeling and simulation of human movement.
Pandy MG
Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2001; 3():245-73. PubMed ID: 11447064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics.
Anderson AE; Ellis BJ; Weiss JA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Jun; 10(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 17558646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OpenSim: a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for
Seth A; Sherman M; Reinbolt JA; Delp SL
Procedia IUTAM; 2011; 2():212-232. PubMed ID: 25893160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of using EMG driven neuromusculoskeletal model for prediction of dynamic movement of the elbow.
Koo TK; Mak AF
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 15642650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Open-Source Toolbox for Surrogate Modeling of Joint Contact Mechanics.
Eskinazi I; Fregly BJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Feb; 63(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 26186761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TECH-VER: A Verification Checklist to Reduce Errors in Models and Improve Their Credibility.
Büyükkaramikli NC; Rutten-van Mölken MPMH; Severens JL; Al M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Nov; 37(11):1391-1408. PubMed ID: 31705406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of the efforts to develop muscle and musculoskeletal models for biomechanics in the last 50 years.
Wakeling JM; Febrer-Nafría M; De Groote F
J Biomech; 2023 Jun; 155():111657. PubMed ID: 37285780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling avian kinematics using software developed for the human musculoskeletal system.
Buford WL; Hollister AM; Andersen CR
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4301-4. PubMed ID: 18002953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational modeling to predict mechanical function of joints: application to the lower leg with simulation of two cadaver studies.
Liacouras PC; Wayne JS
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):811-17. PubMed ID: 18067384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Verification of computational models of cardiac electro-physiology.
Pathmanathan P; Gray RA
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 May; 30(5):525-44. PubMed ID: 24259465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Verification Benchmarks to Assess the Implementation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Hemolysis Prediction Models.
Hariharan P; D'Souza G; Horner M; Malinauskas RA; Myers MR
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Sep; 137(9):. PubMed ID: 26065371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?
Valente G; Pitto L; Testi D; Seth A; Delp SL; Stagni R; Viceconti M; Taddei F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112625. PubMed ID: 25390896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
