These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25474268)

  • 1. BIMMER: a novel algorithm for detecting differential DNA methylation regions from MBDCap-seq data.
    Mao Z; Ma C; Huang TH; Chen Y; Huang Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S6. PubMed ID: 25474268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MBDDiff: an R package designed specifically for processing MBDcap-seq datasets.
    Liu Y; Wilson D; Leach RJ; Chen Y
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):432. PubMed ID: 27556923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite-seq data by hidden Markov models incorporating genome-wide methylation level distributions.
    Saito Y; Mituyama T
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S3. PubMed ID: 26681544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HMM-Fisher: identifying differential methylation using a hidden Markov model and Fisher's exact test.
    Sun S; Yu X
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26854292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HMM-DM: identifying differentially methylated regions using a hidden Markov model.
    Yu X; Sun S
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 26887041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian hidden Markov model for detecting differentially methylated regions.
    Ji T
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):663-673. PubMed ID: 30443900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining MeDIP-seq and MRE-seq to investigate genome-wide CpG methylation.
    Li D; Zhang B; Xing X; Wang T
    Methods; 2015 Jan; 72():29-40. PubMed ID: 25448294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatially Enhanced Differential RNA Methylation Analysis from Affinity-Based Sequencing Data with Hidden Markov Model.
    Zhang YC; Zhang SW; Liu L; Liu H; Zhang L; Cui X; Huang Y; Meng J
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():852070. PubMed ID: 26301253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of epigenetic modulators in human breast cancer by integrated analysis of DNA methylation and RNA-Seq data.
    Zhou X; Chen Z; Cai X
    Epigenetics; 2018; 13(5):473-489. PubMed ID: 29940789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein capture for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveal CpG sequence coverage bias.
    Nair SS; Coolen MW; Stirzaker C; Song JZ; Statham AL; Strbenac D; Robinson MD; Clark SJ
    Epigenetics; 2011 Jan; 6(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 20818161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hidden markov model for identifying differentially methylated sites in bisulfite sequencing data.
    Shokoohi F; Stephens DA; Bourque G; Pastinen T; Greenwood CMT; Labbe A
    Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):210-221. PubMed ID: 30168593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MeDIP-HMM: genome-wide identification of distinct DNA methylation states from high-density tiling arrays.
    Seifert M; Cortijo S; Colomé-Tatché M; Johannes F; Roudier F; Colot V
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 28(22):2930-9. PubMed ID: 22989518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genome-wide analysis and modeling of DNA methylation susceptibility in 30 breast cancer cell lines by using CpG flanking sequences.
    An J; Kim K; Rhee SM; Chae H; Nephew KP; Kim S
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Jun; 11(3):1341003. PubMed ID: 23796180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation.
    Robinson MD; Stirzaker C; Statham AL; Coolen MW; Song JZ; Nair SS; Strbenac D; Speed TP; Clark SJ
    Genome Res; 2010 Dec; 20(12):1719-29. PubMed ID: 21045081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation and gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen C; Peng H; Huang X; Zhao M; Li Z; Yin N; Wang X; Yu F; Yin B; Yuan Y; Lu Q
    Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(4):4507-21. PubMed ID: 26683359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of DNA methylation by MeDIP and MBDCap assays: an overview of techniques.
    Hsu HK; Weng YI; Hsu PY; Huang TH; Huang YW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1105():61-70. PubMed ID: 24623219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whole-genome DNA methylation in skin lesions from patients with psoriasis vulgaris.
    Zhang P; Zhao M; Liang G; Yin G; Huang D; Su F; Zhai H; Wang L; Su Y; Lu Q
    J Autoimmun; 2013 Mar; 41():17-24. PubMed ID: 23369618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detect differentially methylated regions using non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for bisulfite sequencing data.
    Chen Y; Kwok CK; Jiang H; Fan X
    Methods; 2021 May; 189():34-43. PubMed ID: 32949692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whole-genome DNA methylation profiling using MethylCap-seq.
    Brinkman AB; Simmer F; Ma K; Kaan A; Zhu J; Stunnenberg HG
    Methods; 2010 Nov; 52(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 20542119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for differential variability in detecting differentially methylated regions.
    Wang Y; Teschendorff AE; Widschwendter M; Wang S
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jan; 20(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 29912290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.