186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25474507)
1. Practical issues concerning the implementation of Ki-67 proliferative index measurement in breast cancer reporting.
Harvey J; Thomas C; Wood B; Hardie M; Dessauvagie B; Combrinck M; Frost FA; Sterrett G
Pathology; 2015 Jan; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 25474507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardization for Ki-67 assessment in moderately differentiated breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of the SAKK 28/12 study.
Varga Z; Cassoly E; Li Q; Oehlschlegel C; Tapia C; Lehr HA; Klingbiel D; Thürlimann B; Ruhstaller T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123435. PubMed ID: 25885288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of Ki-67 assessment in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
Jing N; Fang C; Williams DS
Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28450087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual assessment of Ki67 using a 5-grade scale (Eye-5) is easy and practical to classify breast cancer subtypes with high reproducibility.
Hida AI; Bando K; Sugita A; Maeda T; Ueda N; Matsukage S; Nakanishi M; Kito K; Miyazaki T; Ohtsuki Y; Oshiro Y; Inoue H; Kawaguchi H; Yamashita N; Aogi K; Moriya T
J Clin Pathol; 2015 May; 68(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 25673730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: assessment of proliferative activity using automated Ki-67 immunostaining.
Dessauvagie B; Thomas A; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrink M; Budhavaram V; Kunjuraman B; Meehan K; Sterrett G; Harvey J
Pathology; 2019 Dec; 51(7):681-687. PubMed ID: 31630876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of mitosis counting by automated phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) digital image analysis in a breast carcinoma tissue microarray.
Dessauvagie BF; Thomas C; Robinson C; Frost FA; Harvey J; Sterrett GF
Pathology; 2015 Jun; 47(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 25938351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer.
Besusparis J; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Green AR; Ellis IO; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Aug; 11(1):82. PubMed ID: 27576949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An intra- and interobserver reproducibility analysis of the Ki-67 proliferation marker assessment on core biopsies of breast cancer patients and its potential clinical implications.
Vörös A; Csörgő E; Nyári T; Cserni G
Pathobiology; 2013; 80(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 23258384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility and Prognostic Potential of Ki-67 Proliferation Index when Comparing Digital-Image Analysis with Standard Semi-Quantitative Evaluation in Breast Cancer.
Ács B; Madaras L; Kovács KA; Micsik T; Tőkés AM; Győrffy B; Kulka J; Szász AM
Pathol Oncol Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28401450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of manual semi-quantitative and automated quantitative Ki-67 proliferative index with OncotypeDXTM recurrence score in invasive breast carcinoma.
Finkelman BS; Meindl A; LaBoy C; Griffin BB; Narayan SP; Brancamp R; Siziopikou KP; Pincus JL; Blanco LZ
Breast Dis; 2022; 41(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 34397396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital quantification of KI-67 in breast cancer.
Del Rosario Taco Sanchez M; Soler-Monsó T; Petit A; Azcarate J; Lasheras A; Artal C; Gil M; Falo C; Pla MJ; Matias-Guiu X
Virchows Arch; 2019 Feb; 474(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 30465110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laboratory validation studies in Ki-67 digital image analysis of breast carcinoma: a pathway to routine quality assurance.
Wang M; McLaren S; Jeyathevan R; Allanson BM; Ireland A; Kang A; Meehan K; Thomas C; Robinson C; Combrinck M; Harvey J; Sterrett G; Dessauvagie B
Pathology; 2019 Apr; 51(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 30850279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proliferation assessment in breast carcinomas using digital image analysis based on virtual Ki67/cytokeratin double staining.
Røge R; Riber-Hansen R; Nielsen S; Vyberg M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 27283833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.
Papantoniou V; Sotiropoulou E; Valsamaki P; Tsaroucha A; Sotiropoulou M; Ptohis N; Stipsanelli A; Dimitrakakis K; Marinopoulos S; Tsiouris S; Antsaklis A
Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20143189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of visual assessment and image analysis in the evaluation of Ki-67 expression and their prognostic significance in immunohistochemically defined luminal breast carcinoma.
Arihiro K; Oda M; Ohara M; Kadoya T; Osaki A; Nishisaka T; Shiroma N; Kobayashi Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 27511992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
