These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25474744)

  • 1. Reliability and validity of a 20-s alternative to the wingate anaerobic test in team sport male athletes.
    Attia A; Hachana Y; Chaabène H; Gaddour A; Neji Z; Shephard RJ; Chelly MS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114444. PubMed ID: 25474744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of score on an abbreviated Wingate test for field sport participants.
    Hachana Y; Attia A; Nassib S; Shephard RJ; Chelly MS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 22516906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a six second cycle test for the determination of peak power output.
    Herbert P; Sculthorpe N; Baker JS; Grace FM
    Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 25720917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-retest reliability of the 20-sec Wingate test to assess anaerobic power in children with cerebral palsy.
    Dallmeijer AJ; Scholtes VA; Brehm MA; Becher JG
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Sep; 92(9):762-7. PubMed ID: 23221669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple multistage field test for the prediction of anaerobic capacity in female games players.
    Cooper SM; Baker JS; Eaton ZE; Matthews N
    Br J Sports Med; 2004 Dec; 38(6):784-9. PubMed ID: 15562181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of a new maximal anaerobic shuttle running test.
    Dardouri W; Gharbi Z; Selmi MA; Sassi RH; Moalla W; Chamari K; Souissi N
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Apr; 35(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 24081619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an Anaerobic Sprint Running Test Using a Nonmotorized Treadmill.
    McLain TA; Wright GA; Camic CL; Kovacs AJ; Hegge JM; Brice GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2197-204. PubMed ID: 25627645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-validation of the 20- versus 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.
    Laurent CM; Meyers MC; Robinson CA; Green JM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2007 Aug; 100(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 17429677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of a 5 x 6-s maximal cycling repeated-sprint test in trained female team-sport athletes.
    McGawley K; Bishop D
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Nov; 98(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 16955291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and validity of a new repeated agility test as a measure of anaerobic and explosive power.
    Haj-Sassi R; Dardouri W; Gharbi Z; Chaouachi A; Mansour H; Rabhi A; Mahfoudhi ME
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Feb; 25(2):472-80. PubMed ID: 21240028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of two different methods of anaerobic capacity assessment in sedentary young men.
    Klasnja A; Drapsin M; Lukac D; Drid P; Obadov S; Grujić N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20361697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of the Illinois agility test in male team sport athletes.
    Hachana Y; Chaabène H; Nabli MA; Attia A; Moualhi J; Farhat N; Elloumi M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Oct; 27(10):2752-9. PubMed ID: 23439329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a specific anaerobic field test for aerobic gymnastics.
    Alves CR; Borelli MT; Paineli Vde S; Azevedo Rde A; Borelli CC; Lancha Junior AH; Gualano B; Artioli GG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123115. PubMed ID: 25876039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hop performance and leg muscle power in athletes: Reliability of a test battery.
    Kockum B; Heijne AI
    Phys Ther Sport; 2015 Aug; 16(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 25891995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wingate Test as a Strong Predictor of 1500-m Performance in Elite Speed Skaters.
    Hofman N; Orie J; Hoozemans MJM; Foster C; de Koning JJ
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Nov; 12(10):1288-1292. PubMed ID: 28253027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of cycling peak power as measured by a short-sprint test versus the Wingate anaerobic test.
    Coso JD; Mora-Rodríguez R
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Jun; 31(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 16770343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of the 30-s continuous jump test for anaerobic fitness evaluation.
    Dal Pupo J; Gheller RG; Dias JA; Rodacki AL; Moro AR; Santos SG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Nov; 17(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 24606832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of Wingate testing in adolescents with Down syndrome.
    Guerra M; Gine-Garriga M; Fernhall B
    Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2009 Feb; 21(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19411710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Kansas Squat Test: A Valid and Practical Measure of Anaerobic Power for Track and Field Power Athletes.
    Luebbers PE; Fry AC
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Oct; 29(10):2716-22. PubMed ID: 25763520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.