156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25475267)
1. Evaluation and comparison of rapid methods for the detection of Salmonella in naturally contaminated pine nuts using different pre enrichment media.
Wang H; Gill VS; Cheng CM; Gonzalez-Escalona N; Irvin KA; Zheng J; Bell RL; Jacobson AP; Hammack TS
Food Microbiol; 2015 Apr; 46():58-65. PubMed ID: 25475267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative effectiveness of selected preenrichment media for the detection of Salmonella from leafy green produce and herbs.
Jacobson AP; Wang H; Gill VS; Duvall R; Arce G; Chirtel S; Hammack TS
Food Microbiol; 2017 May; 63():123-128. PubMed ID: 28040159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. VIDAS Salmonella (SLM) assay method EasySLM with ChromID Salmonella (SM2) Agar. Performance Tested Method 020901.
Johnson R; Mills J; Colón-Reveles J
J AOAC Int; 2009; 92(6):1861-4. PubMed ID: 20166608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA
Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative effectiveness of the Bacteriological Analytical Manual method for the recovery of Salmonella from whole cantaloupes and cantaloupe rinses with selected preenrichment media and rapid methods.
Hammack TS; Valentin-Bon IE; Jacobson AP; Andrews WH
J Food Prot; 2004 May; 67(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 15151220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of 3M Molecular Detection System and ANSR Pathogen Detection System for rapid detection of Salmonella from egg products.
Hu L; Ma LM; Zheng S; He X; Wang H; Brown EW; Hammack TS; Zhang G
Poult Sci; 2017 May; 96(5):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 27811324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Isolation of Salmonella from alfalfa seed and demonstration of impaired growth of heat-injured cells in seed homogenates.
Liao CH; Fett WF
Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 May; 82(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 12593927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of universal pre-enrichment broth for isolation of Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes from dairy farm environmental samples.
Nam HM; Murinda SE; Nguyen LT; Oliver SP
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2004; 1(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15992260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Cubana from Naturally Contaminated Chick Feed.
Benahmed F; Wang H; Beaubrun JJ; Gopinath GR; Cheng CM; Hanes DE; Hammack TS; Rasmussen M; Davidson MK
J Food Prot; 2017 Nov; 80(11):1815-1820. PubMed ID: 28981377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of four different methods for Salmonella detection in fecal samples of porcine origin.
Korsak N; Degeye JN; Etienne G; China B; Daube G
J Food Prot; 2004 Oct; 67(10):2158-64. PubMed ID: 15508624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of enrichment medium on real-time detection of Salmonella enterica from lettuce and tomato enrichment cultures.
Gorski L; Liang AS
J Food Prot; 2010 Jun; 73(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20537259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interlaboratory validation of a real-time PCR 24-hour rapid method for detection of Salmonella in foods.
Cheng CM; Van Khanh T; Lin W; Ruby RM
J Food Prot; 2009 May; 72(5):945-51. PubMed ID: 19517719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different buffered peptone water (BPW) based enrichment broths for detection of Gram-negative foodborne pathogens from various food matrices.
Margot H; Zwietering MH; Joosten H; O'Mahony E; Stephan R
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():109-115. PubMed ID: 26267889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of rapid screening techniques for detection of Salmonella spp. from produce samples after pre-enrichment according to FDA BAM and a short secondary enrichment.
Yoshitomi KJ; Jinneman KC; Orlandi PA; Weagant SD; Zapata R; Fedio WM
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jul; 61(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 25809127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the enrichment procedure for Enterobacteriaceae detection.
Weber C; Stephan R; Druggan P; Joosten H; Iversen C
Food Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 26(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 19527830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of sample preparation and preenrichment media on the recovery of Salmonella from cantaloupes, mangoes, and tomatoes.
Hammack TS; Johnson ML; Jacobson AP; Andrews WH
J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 16512245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Salmonella detection in probiotic products.
Joosten H; Bidlas E; Garofalo N
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 16690151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella spp. in food: An alternative approach to a conventional PCR system suggested by the FOOD-PCR project.
Hein I; Flekna G; Krassnig M; Wagner M
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Sep; 66(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 16564585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective pre-enrichment method to lessen time needed to recover Salmonella from commercial poultry processing samples.
Rasamsetti S; Berrang M; Cox NA; Shariat NW
Food Microbiol; 2021 Oct; 99():103818. PubMed ID: 34119103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of Salmonella detection in garlic, onion, cinnamon, red chili pepper powders and green tea.
Barrere V; Tompkins E; Armstrong M; Bird P; Bastin B; Goodridge L
Int J Food Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 316():108440. PubMed ID: 31733520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
