These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25475516)

  • 21. Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
    Mrak K; Uranitsch S; Pedross F; Heuberger A; Klingler A; Jagoditsch M; Weihs D; Eberl T; Tschmelitsch J
    Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1129-39. PubMed ID: 26706610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ghost ileostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: is it worthwhile?
    Mori L; Vita M; Razzetta F; Meinero P; D'Ambrosio G
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jan; 56(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 23222277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer.
    Ji WB; Kwak JM; Kim J; Um JW; Kim SH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(19):5910-7. PubMed ID: 26019455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.
    Yang S; Lin Y; Zhong W; Xu W; Huang Z; Cai S; Chen W; Zhang B
    Int Wound J; 2024 Mar; 21(3):e14493. PubMed ID: 37989718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early prediction of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal surgery using creactive protein.
    Jin D; Chen L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jun; 100(22):e26196. PubMed ID: 34087889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection--is diverting stoma still justified?
    Leester B; Asztalos I; Polnyib C
    Acta Chir Iugosl; 2002; 49(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 12587473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic surgery may decrease the risk of clinical anastomotic leakage and a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Zheng H; Wu Z; Wu Y; Mo S; Dai W; Liu F; Xu Y; Cai S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Feb; 34(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 30470941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Clinical application of compound anastomotic device in protective terminal ileostomy during rectal cancer operation].
    Huang Q; Cao F; Zhou J; Liu L; Ge B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1375-1380. PubMed ID: 29280120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
    Akiyoshi T; Ueno M; Fukunaga Y; Nagayama S; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Yamaguchi T
    Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21871980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Male sex and history of ischemic heart disease are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer.
    Shinji S; Ueda Y; Yamada T; Koizumi M; Yokoyama Y; Takahashi G; Hotta M; Iwai T; Hara K; Takeda K; Okusa M; Kan H; Uchida E; Yoshida H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 30016941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ghost Ileostomy with or without abdominal parietal split.
    Cerroni M; Cirocchi R; Morelli U; Trastulli S; Desiderio J; Mezzacapo M; Listorti C; Esperti L; Milani D; Avenia N; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    World J Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 9():92. PubMed ID: 21849090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The prevention of rectovaginal fistula after rectal cancer surgery by packing with laparoscopic dislocated fat flap containing ovarian vascular pedicle anterior to the anastomotic stoma: a parallel group randomized controlled trial protocol.
    Ye DX; Huang SH; Lin Y; Ying-Huang ; Chi P
    Trials; 2024 Jan; 25(1):63. PubMed ID: 38233938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current practice in Australia and New Zealand for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery with anastomosis: Analysis of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit.
    Grupa VEM; Kroon HM; Ozmen I; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Sammour T
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Jun; 23(6):1421-1433. PubMed ID: 33650280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early stoma closure after low anterior resection is not recommended due to postoperative complications and asymptomatic anastomotic leakage.
    Fukudome I; Maeda H; Okamoto K; Yamaguchi S; Fujisawa K; Shiga M; Dabanaka K; Kobayashi M; Namikawa T; Hanazaki K
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6472. PubMed ID: 37081037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.
    Gastinger I; Marusch F; Steinert R; Wolff S; Koeckerling F; Lippert H;
    Br J Surg; 2005 Sep; 92(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 15997447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk and early predictive factors of anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Fukada M; Matsuhashi N; Takahashi T; Imai H; Tanaka Y; Yamaguchi K; Yoshida K
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 31677643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study between ghost ileostomy and defunctioning ileostomy in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Zenger S; Gurbuz B; Can U; Balik E; Yalti T; Bugra D
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Mar; 406(2):339-347. PubMed ID: 33537875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining the protective characteristics and risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Suzuki N; Yoshida S; Tomochika S; Nakagami Y; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Iida M; Takeda S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
    Surg Today; 2021 May; 51(5):713-720. PubMed ID: 33006668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of a Transanal Drainage Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.
    Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 May; 21(5):1441-1444. PubMed ID: 32458653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Meta-analysis for high-risk factor of anastomotic leakage after anal-preserving surgery for rectal cancer].
    Ye Y; Jiang H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apirl 25; 21(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 29682718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.