282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25475865)
1. Comparison of brush and basket cytology in differential diagnosis of bile duct stricture at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Bang KB; Kim HJ; Park JH; Park DI; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2014 Dec; 13(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 25475865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined brush cytology and stent placement in a single session for presumed malignant biliary stricture.
Kawada N; Uehara H; Katayama K; Takano Y; Takakura R; Imanaka K; Ohkawa K; Takenaka A; Ishikawa O
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21443662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T
Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of single operator cholangioscopy on accuracy of bile duct cytology.
Aly FZ; Mostofizadeh S; Jawaid S; Knapik J; Mukhtar F; Klein R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Dec; 48(12):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 32770823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.
Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures.
Farrell RJ; Jain AK; Brandwein SL; Wang H; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 11677474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.
de Bellis M; Fogel EL; Sherman S; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Younger C; Cramer H; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 12872082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Intraductal Ultrasonography, Endoscopic Brush Cytology and K-ras, P53 Gene Mutation in the Early Diagnosis of Malignant Bile Duct Stricture.
Huang P; Zhang H; Zhang XF; Zhang X; Lyu W; Fan Z
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jul; 128(14):1887-92. PubMed ID: 26168827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of in vitro photodynamic cytodiagnosis with 5-aminolevulinic acid in biliary brush cytology for malignant biliary stricture.
Hirao M; Hosui A; Mimura A; Ohnishi K; Tanimoto T; Okahara T; Sueyoshi Y; Goto T; Yamada T; Hiramatsu N
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Jun; 38():102756. PubMed ID: 35150900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraductal aspiration: a promising new tissue-sampling technique for the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures.
Curcio G; Traina M; Mocciaro F; Liotta R; Gentile R; Tarantino I; Barresi L; Granata A; Tuzzolino F; Gridelli B
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):798-804. PubMed ID: 22301344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How many cytological examinations should be performed for the diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube?
Uchida N; Kamada H; Ono M; Aritomo Y; Masaki T; Nakatsu T; Kuriyama S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1501-4. PubMed ID: 18028351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of bile cytology associated with brush cytology of the bile duct: a comparative study of 115 patients].
Fior-Gozlan M; Bosio C; Croset C; Bichard P
Ann Pathol; 2006 Oct; 26(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 17255924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grasp or brush for biliary sampling at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography? A blinded randomized controlled trial.
Dumonceau JM; Macias Gomez C; Casco C; Genevay M; Marcolongo M; Bongiovanni M; Morel P; Majno P; Hadengue A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 103(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 17900324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
