329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25476176)
1. Imaging of head and neck lymph nodes.
Eisenmenger LB; Wiggins RH
Radiol Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 53(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 25476176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radio-anatomy of lymph node groups in the area of otolaryngology].
Sigal R; Lamer S
J Radiol; 1999 Dec; 80(12 Suppl):1816-9. PubMed ID: 11013706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes: normal anatomy, variants of normal, and applications in staging head and neck cancer. Part I: normal anatomy.
Mancuso AA; Harnsberger HR; Muraki AS; Stevens MH
Radiology; 1983 Sep; 148(3):709-14. PubMed ID: 6878691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical lymph node evaluation and diagnosis.
Bryson TC; Shah GV; Srinivasan A; Mukherji SK
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 45(6):1363-83. PubMed ID: 23153753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Prativadi R; Dahiya N; Kamaya A; Bhatt S
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2017 Oct; 38(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 29031367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging evaluation of lymphadenopathy and patterns of lymph node spread in head and neck cancer.
Forghani R; Yu E; Levental M; Som PM; Curtin HD
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2015 Feb; 15(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 25385488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External ultrasonography of the neck does not add diagnostic value to integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Blom RL; Vliegen RF; Schreurs WM; Belgers HJ; Stohr I; Oostenbrug LE; Sosef MN
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Aug; 25(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 22150869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lymph node pathology. Benign proliferative, lymphoma, and metastatic disease.
Sakai O; Curtin HD; Romo LV; Som PM
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Sep; 38(5):979-98, x. PubMed ID: 11054964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of lymph nodes in the head and neck.
Ishikawa M; Anzai Y
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2002 Aug; 10(3):527-42. PubMed ID: 12530233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of only 18F-fluorodeocyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Lee SH; Huh SH; Jin SM; Rho YS; Yoon DY; Park CH
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(4):692-8. PubMed ID: 22535915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.
Holzapfel K; Duetsch S; Fauser C; Eiber M; Rummeny EJ; Gaa J
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 18995981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. It's not a cervical lymph node, it's a vein: CT and MR imaging findings in the veins of the head and neck.
Escott EJ; Branstetter BF
Radiographics; 2006; 26(5):1501-15. PubMed ID: 16973778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modern imaging lymph node staging of the head and neck region.
Krestan C; Herneth AM; Formanek M; Czerny C
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 16687230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.
Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node imaging: multidetector CT (MDCT).
Silverman PM
Cancer Imaging; 2005 Nov; 5 Spec No A(Spec No A):S57-67. PubMed ID: 16361138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
