These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25476416)

  • 21. Dynamic analysis of the aortic valve using a finite element model.
    Gnyaneshwar R; Kumar RK; Balakrishnan KR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Apr; 73(4):1122-9. PubMed ID: 11996252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the opening mechanism of the aortic valve: some observations from simulations.
    Howard IC; Patterson EA; Yoxall A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2003; 27(6):259-66. PubMed ID: 14602517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional coupled fluid-structure simulation of pericardial bioprosthetic aortic valve function.
    Makhijani VB; Yang HQ; Dionne PJ; Thubrikar MJ
    ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M387-92. PubMed ID: 9360067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Study of Biomechanics of the Heart Valve Leaflet Apparatus Using Numerical Simulation Method.
    Klyshnikov KY; Onischenko PS; Ovcharenko ЕА
    Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2022; 14(2):6-14. PubMed ID: 37065424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computational finite element analyses to optimize graft sizing during aortic valve-sparing procedure.
    Totaro P; Morganti S; Yon CL; Dore R; Conti M; Auricchio F; Vigano M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Mar; 21(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 22645846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of finite element analysis to the design of tissue leaflets for a percutaneous aortic valve.
    Smuts AN; Blaine DC; Scheffer C; Weich H; Doubell AF; Dellimore KH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 21094482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is it possible to assess the best mitral valve repair in the individual patient? Preliminary results of a finite element study from magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Sturla F; Onorati F; Votta E; Pechlivanidis K; Stevanella M; Milano AD; Puppini G; Mazzucco A; Redaelli A; Faggian G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):1025-34; discussion 1034. PubMed ID: 25052823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The emulation of aortic valve vibration during early diastole].
    Yang M; Zhang J; Zhang H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 18(4):557-60. PubMed ID: 11791307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Advanced modeling strategy for the analysis of heart valve leaflet tissue mechanics using high-order finite element method.
    Mohammadi H; Bahramian F; Wan W
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1110-7. PubMed ID: 19773193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanisms of aortic valve incompetence: finite-element modeling of Marfan syndrome.
    Grande-Allen KJ; Cochran RP; Reinhall PG; Kunzelman KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Nov; 122(5):946-54. PubMed ID: 11689800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A biomechanical model of the pathological aortic valve: simulation of aortic stenosis.
    Loureiro-Ga M; Veiga C; Fdez-Manin G; Jimenez VA; Calvo-Iglesias F; Iñiguez A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):303-311. PubMed ID: 31996041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intraoperative three-dimensional versus two-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular assessment.
    Meris A; Santambrogio L; Casso G; Mauri R; Engeler A; Cassina T
    Anesth Analg; 2014 Apr; 118(4):711-20. PubMed ID: 24651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computational modeling of cardiac valve function and intervention.
    Sun W; Martin C; Pham T
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 16():53-76. PubMed ID: 24819475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the biaxial mechanical properties of the layers of the aortic valve leaflet.
    Stella JA; Sacks MS
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):757-66. PubMed ID: 17887902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Flexible versus rigid ring annuloplasty for mitral valve annular dilatation: a finite element model.
    Kunzelman KS; Reimink MS; Cochran RP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jan; 7(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 9502148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Normal aortic valves stay open much longer in systole than porcine substitutes.
    Subhani M; Kumar RK; Balakrishnan KR
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2013 Jun; 21(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 24570492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related changes in the aortic valve affect leaflet stress distributions: implications for aortic valve degeneration.
    Singh R; Strom JA; Ondrovic L; Joseph B; VanAuker MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 May; 17(3):290-8; discussion 299. PubMed ID: 18592926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of a fluid-structure interaction model of a heart valve using the dynamic mesh method in fluent.
    Dumont K; Stijnen JM; Vierendeels J; van de Vosse FN; Verdonck PR
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15512757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interlayer micromechanics of the aortic heart valve leaflet.
    Buchanan RM; Sacks MS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Aug; 13(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 24292631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.