446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25476699)
1. Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives.
Naoum SJ; Mutzelburg PR; Shumack TG; Thode D; Martin FE; Ellakwa AE
Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 25476699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel and dentine shear bond strength of two resin modified glass ionomers and two resin based adhesives.
Gordan VV; Boyer D; Söderholm KJ
J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):497-503. PubMed ID: 9699443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive.
Bishara SE; VonWald L; Olsen ME; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10672216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin.
Shirai K; De Munck J; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Suzuki K; Shintani H; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 15681009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.
Francois P; Vennat E; Le Goff S; Ruscassier N; Attal JP; Dursun E
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2599-2608. PubMed ID: 30317399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bond failure at dentin-composite interfaces with 'single-bottle' adhesives.
Walshaw PR; Tam LE; McComb D
J Dent; 2003 Feb; 31(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12654551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microshear Bond Strength of Tri-Calcium Silicate-based Cements to Different Restorative Materials.
Cengiz E; Ulusoy N
J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 27045140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives.
Bishara SE; VonWald L; Olsen ME; Laffoon JF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):616-20. PubMed ID: 10587594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.
Sabatini C; Patel M; D'Silva E
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating dentin surface treatments for resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
Imbery TA; Namboodiri A; Duncan A; Amos R; Best AM; Moon PC
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):429-38. PubMed ID: 23088188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
