These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2547686)

  • 1. Wire-guided brush cytology: a new endoscopic method for diagnosis of bile duct cancer.
    Foutch PG; Harlan JR; Kerr D; Sanowski RA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1989; 35(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 2547686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malignant tumors of the bile ducts: diagnosis by biopsy during endoscopic cannulation.
    Rustgi AK; Kelsey PB; Guelrud M; Saini S; Schapiro RH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1989; 35(3):248-51. PubMed ID: 2547687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy.
    Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
    Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of novel slim biopsy forceps for diagnosis of biliary strictures: Single-institutional study of consecutive 360 cases (with video).
    Yamamoto K; Tsuchiya T; Itoi T; Tsuji S; Tanaka R; Tonozuka R; Honjo M; Mukai S; Kamada K; Fujita M; Asai Y; Matsunami Y; Nagakawa Y; Yamaguchi H; Sofuni A
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Sep; 23(35):6429-6436. PubMed ID: 29085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of brush and basket cytology in differential diagnosis of bile duct stricture at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Bang KB; Kim HJ; Park JH; Park DI; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2014 Dec; 13(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 25475865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.
    Schoefl R; Haefner M; Wrba F; Pfeffel F; Stain C; Poetzi R; Gangl A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 9140159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staging of biliary carcinoma: cholangiography and cholangioscopy.
    Nimura Y
    Endoscopy; 1993 Jan; 25(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 8384103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of exfoliative cytology for investigating bile duct strictures.
    Davidson B; Varsamidakis N; Dooley J; Deery A; Dick R; Kurzawinski T; Hobbs K
    Gut; 1992 Oct; 33(10):1408-11. PubMed ID: 1446870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endoscopic needle aspiration biopsy at ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.
    Howell DA; Beveridge RP; Bosco J; Jones M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1992; 38(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 1327937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
    Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
    Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.
    Pugliese V; Conio M; Nicolò G; Saccomanno S; Gatteschi B
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec; 42(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 8674921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
    Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative TNM classification of proximal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma by endosonography.
    Tio TL; Wijers OB; Sars PR; Tytgat GN
    Semin Liver Dis; 1990 May; 10(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 2162563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic evaluation of bile duct strictures.
    Yoon WJ; Brugge WR
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2013 Apr; 23(2):277-93. PubMed ID: 23540961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solitary hilar biliary adenoma: MR imaging and MR cholangiography features with pathologic correlation.
    Boraschi P; Donati F; Volpi A; Pollina LE
    Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Nov; 39(11):1031-4. PubMed ID: 17317343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Navaneethan U; Njei B; Lourdusamy V; Konjeti R; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 25440678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extra-hepatic bile duct adenoma in a patient with a choledochal cyst.
    Aggarwal S; Kumar S; Kumar A; Bhasin R; Garg PK; Bandhu S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Mar; 18(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 12603542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endobiliary brush biopsy: Intra- and interobserver variation in cytological evaluation of brushings from bile duct strictures.
    Adamsen S; Olsen M; Jendresen MB; Holck S; Glenthøj A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 May; 41(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 16638704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro, randomized, prospective study to maximize cellular yield during bile duct brush cytology.
    Baron TH; Lee JG; Wax TD; Schmitt CM; Cotton PB; Leung JW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):146-9. PubMed ID: 8013811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.